permanent building; and a case in which, after a permanent building has been erected all considerable expense, he seeks to have the building removed ... present case as there is no legal ban on partition of the building if that becomes necessary.
58. On behalf of the appellant reliance
family property. This building was purchased
6
by Laxminarayan when he was carrying on business
with his two brothers and the partition ... took place
long after the acquisition of that building. In that
partition that building was allotted to Laxminarayan
alone......"
9. The High Court
that defendant 2 had no right to transfer the building.... The effect of the partition was to transfer the site to the plaintiffs. There ... members of the family out of his separate funds. A building in partition would go to the person who built it and if that were
storage tankers In the premises and have thereby materially damaged the building. Partition walls between the shops have been demolished, new openings have been made ... shops and thereby materially diminished the value of the shops and building. They have also made water storage tanks over the open roof which
building could establish a valid dedication of the building for religious and charitable purposes.
9. We have been taken through the partition deed dated March ... recitals in the partition deed and the settlement deed. Neither under the partition deed nor under the settlement deed the building " Nataraja Nilayam
family property. This building was purchased by
Laxminarayan when he was carrying on business with his two
brothers and the partition ... took place long after the acquisition of that
building. In that partition that building was allotted to Laxminarayan
::: Downloaded on - 27/08/2013
construct building if she has no building of her own. The allegation that there was an oral partition in May 1974 and the 1st plaintiff ... that not only the building and the land on which the building is situated but entire land where the building is situated will be treated
landlord claimed that he got the said four storeyed building in partition in 1979 and required ground floor portion in possession of tenants for various ... premises in which said firms were having office or establishment in partition and partition deed is a device to eject tenant is perverse and misconceived
landlord claimed that he got the said four storeyed building in partition in 1979 and required ground floor portion in possession of tenants for various ... premises in which said firms were having office or establishment in partition and partition deed is a device to eject tenant is perverse and misconceived
building or
of the floors which otherwise have been constructed in accordance with the
building byelaws does not amount to partition by metes and bounds ... partitioning of the building and additions and
alterations therein to make separate living units in the same
building. Even this partition as well as addition
