Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 are brothers. A
suit for partition was filed by Respondent No.1. A preliminary decree was
passed ... Code of Civil Procedure which
is in the following terms :
"54. Partition of estate or separation of share.-
Where the decree
some of which suits decrees were obtained by the Zamorin for the partition of the particular parcels comprised in such suits. In each of these ... under a Jenmi, while as regards the Nair, the plaint asked for partition, so that in the result the tenant might be left in undisturbed
property was in possession of the defendants 1 to 3
till the partition taken place in the year 1956. In the partition during the
year ... cents. It was allotted to the share of Samayana Devar during partition
between the father and his brother Ramu Devar. The appellant/third defendant
Ramamurti, J.
1. This appeal arises out of a suit for partition, O.S. No. 90 of 1960, Sub-Court, Trichy, and defendants ... this litigation. The plaintiff, Sheik Meerasa Rowther, filed the suit for partition claiming to be entitled to 287/720ths share in the estate left behind
follows: -
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
JAGDISH KUMAR
“(1)(a) For partition and separate
th
possession of their 1/5 share each, in
Date ... schedule properties from 1983 onwards till
the date of suit and for partition of 1/5th
share of each plaintiff, in the said
rentals
dedication, submitted to the Court that he had no objection to a partition being made of the property, if the Court thought ... made a consent decree in the nature of a preliminary decree for partition, directing the property to be divided into moieties
represented in the coparcenery. The plaintiff is now suing for partition of the joint family property and to have allotted to her the share which ... purchaser has in such a case is a right to sue for partition and procure to be allotted to himself the share which would have
relationship mentioned in para-3 of the plaint and the partition on 20.02.1956 are admitted. The suit property and the other properties allotted ... were belonged to the joint family of Sengoda Gounder. There was a partition between them on 20.02.1956. The suit property among other properties were allotted
parceners but should be left to his remedy of a suit for partition: Balaji Anant Rajadiksha v. Ganesh Janurdan Kamati ... coparcener, but can be declared to be entitled to hold (pending a partition) as a tenant-in-common with the other coparceners: Babaji Lakshman
coparceners, but should be left to his remedy of a suit for partition: Balaji Anant Rajddiksha v. Ganeh Janardan Kamati ... coparcener, but can be declared to be entitled to hold (pending a partition) as a tenant-in-common with the other co-parceners: Babaji Lakshman
