Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (2.57 seconds)

Valarmathi Mariyan vs Palkees Ummal

Indian Evidence Act for proving the documents which have been registered in accordance with the provisions of Indian Registration Act . 19. That apart, the beneficiary ... towards the above act, the documents which were duly registered, but were not denied specifically, cannot be assailed in the mere partition suit. The plaintiff
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

Valarmathi Mariyan vs Palkees Ummal

Indian Evidence Act for proving the documents which have been registered in accordance with the provisions of Indian Registration Act . 19. That apart, the beneficiary ... towards the above act, the documents which were duly registered, but were not denied specifically, cannot be assailed in the mere partition suit. The plaintiff
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

S.P.Sundaram vs B.Ashok Babu on 19 April, 2023

suit properties are originally allotted to the first defendant in a partition effected among his brother and father on 28.4.1992. Further, the recitals would show ... amendment brought in under Section 17(1A) of the Registration Act. The same reads as follows: Section 17 in The Registration Act , 1908 17. Documents
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

Kannammal vs R.Thangavelu on 5 April, 2023

trial Court has dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs for partition. Challenging the same, the present appeal came to be filed by the plaintiffs ... appellants, there is no compliance under Section 69 of the Evidence Act. Therefore, the Will cannot be relied upon to deny the valid rights
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document
1   2 Next