The Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960
The Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960
ODISHA
India
The Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960
Act
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 272 (0.81 seconds)V. N. Sarin vs Major Ajit Kumar Poplai on 9 August, 1965
Acquisition by transfer', meaning of-Allotment of share on
partition of Hindu undivided family-Whether transfer within
meaning of section.
HEADNOTE:
The appellant became ... Hindu
undivided family of which respondent No. 2 was the head. On
partition of the family property, the said premises fell to
the share
Nichhalbhai Vallabhai And Ors. vs Jaswantlal Zinabhai And Ors. on 23 August, 1965
Surat.
2. The first respondent filed the suit "for partition of the Joint family properties" in the Court of the Civil Judge ... alleged that the plaintiff was not entitled to maintain the suit for partition of the joint family properties because he had not obtained the previous
C.M.V. Krishnamachari vs M.D. Dhanalakshmi Ammal And Ors. on 16 April, 1965
petitioner herein filed for impleading himself as a supplemental defendant in a partition suit, Original Suit No. 51 of 1963. Respondents 1 and 2 herein ... third respondent, M.K. Sundararama Iyer, is the first defendant against whom partition was claimed. The petitioner's case in support of his application
Karpagathachi And Ors vs Nagarathinathachi on 10 March, 1965
Hindu Law--Partition between co-widows--Whether right
of survivorship can be relinquished--If repugnant to
Transfer of Property ... certificate:
HELD: (i) Under the Hindu Law the widows were competent
to partition the properties and allot separate portions
each, and incidental to such allotment
V.N. Sarin vs Ajit Kumar Poplai And Anr. on 1 March, 1965
that presented some difficulty to the learned Single Judge was whether the partition of the coparcenary property amount the coparceners could be said ... premises as a tenant by the father B. S. Poplai before the partition at a monthly rental of Rs. 80/- Ajit Kumar Poplai brought
Commissioner Of Gift-Tax vs N.S. Getti Chettiar on 10 December, 1965
Goyindaraju Chettiar who had six sons. There was a partition of immovable properties by a registered deed executed on 17th January, 1958, and of movable ... April, 1958. On 29th November, 1958, the claim of the assessee for partition was granted by the department. The total value of the joint family
Ramaswami Pillai vs Subramania Pillai By ... on 16 December, 1965
scope of the jurisdiction of the Court under Section 4 of the Partition Act (IV of 1893):
Whether a sharer can claim ... share in a family dwelling house, in a suit for partition instituted not by the stranger-transferee but by a member of the family
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras vs Rm. Ar. Ar. Veerappa Chettiar. on 25 August, 1965
will of Arunachalam Chettiar (senior) as to the direction for partition and separated possession of a third share for each of the adopted for sons ... adopted son of Arunachalam Chettiar (junior), there was pre-partition agreement between himself and his adoptive mother by which the assessee was entitled
P.N. Venkatasubramania Iyer And Ors. vs P.N. Easwara Iyer And Ors. on 21 January, 1965
purported to effect not merely a severance in status, but an actual partition between himself and his sons. This situation is complicated by the fact ... dated 5-6-1953, which concerns the larger partition in the main family, itself shows that those properties now in controversy, part of which