Narendra Kumar Parwanda vs Union Of India And Anr. on 29 August, 2013
Author: Valmiki J. Mehta
Bench: Valmiki J.Mehta
* IN THE HIGH COURT ... 29th August, 2013
1. W.P.(C) No. 4400/1996
NARENDRA KUMAR PARWANDA ......Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sarvesh Bisaria, Advocate with
Mr. Parkash Chandra Sharma,
Advocate
written statement that plaintiff had taken over the
company from Sh. Vipen Parwanda for a consideration and the same
was not fully paid ... party
to the transactions between the plaintiffs and Sh. Vipen Parwanda,
the plaintiffs have offered to mortgage the property as security for
the repayment
Extension
Opposite Nehru Place
Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019
Through its proprietor
AK Parwanda (HUF)
Represented through its present Karta
Sh. Gaurav Kumar Parwanda ... Late Sh. Ashok Kumar Parwanda.
........... Plaintiff
Versus
1. Institute of Technology and Management
Managed by Samata Lok Sansthan Trust
Guru Kripa, ITM Campus
Opposite Sithouli
Sengh, Sr
Advocate, Mr Mohit Mathur, Mr Gurpreet S. Parwanda,
Mr Vidit Gupta, Ms Yamini Khurana, Mr Vishnu Kant,
Ms Harleen Singh, Mr Sumit Batra
affixed at the door of the premises to
the effect that Indu Parwanda was the decree holder of the suit
CM(M) No.541/2013 ... contended that the actual owner of the flat No. 201 was Indu
Parwanda who had also filed suit against the respondent seeking
possession of this
Sengh, Sr
Advocate, Mr Mohit Mathur, Mr Gurpreet S. Parwanda,
Mr Vidit Gupta, Ms Yamini Khurana, Mr Vishnu Kant,
Ms Harleen Singh, Mr Sumit Batra
deceased has also left behind three
daughters namely Renuka Kashyap, Ragini Parwanda and Ramnik
Sood. Out of them, Ramnik Sood had also expired leaving behind
