Kcl Amrcl Joint Venture, Hyderabad, ... vs Ito, Ward-6(4), Hyderabad, Hyderabad on 29 November, 2017
profit in the business and the
assessee being used as a Passover entity and set up only to secure
the order
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 151 (0.92 seconds)Ito, Ward-14(1), Hyderabad, Hyderabad vs Jv Of Best And Crompton Engineering ... on 31 August, 2017
profit in the business and the
assessee being used as a Passover entity and set up only to secure
the order
Kodeboyina Srinivas Krishna vs Pvm Innvensys Pvt Ltd & Anr on 25 September, 2020
counsel for appellant was busy in another case he requested
for a passover which was not granted and the arguments were heard
by a single
Procter & Gamble Hygiene And Health Care ... vs Dcit Rg 10(3)(2), Mumbai on 6 October, 2017
reasons: -
Date of Hearing Reason for adjournment
April, 03, 2017 Following a Passover, adjourned by the
Bench
M/S Haryana Acrylic Mfg. Co. P.Ltd vs Cce, New Delhi on 28 February, 2012
busy before the Honble Supreme Court, the request was made to passover the matter and matter was again called around 12.40 p.m. when
Naveen Sharma Son Of Sh. V.N. Sharma vs Union Of India Through Secretary To ... on 31 March, 2016
MEMBER (J):-
1. None is present for the applicants today inspite of passover. Same was the position on the last date of hearing also
Director General State Transport vs Chandigarh-I on 22 July, 2025
their agreement; being aware of the taxability and statute they
cannot simply Passover their responsibility of payment of tax to their
service recipient; Section
S. D. Wadhwa vs Registrar Cooperative Society on 30 January, 2018
Page 9
"1. None is present for the petitioner. Even a Passover is not sought.
Consequently, this Court has no other option
Dr Ashok Kumar Panda vs Central Councilfor Research In ... on 2 April, 2024
states that on 08.01.2024,
09.01.2024 the matter was listed and after two passovers
there was no representation on behalf of the applicant ... after two passovers the learned proxy
counsel for the applicant (in the OA) appeared and the order
was passed by the Single Bench and listed
A Muthu Manickam vs South Western Railway on 8 April, 2026
with the fact of the case. He
requested the bench for a Passover as his legal representative is on his way.
The bench agreed ... request and granted a Passover. The matter was again
taken up at the end of the board, but no representative on behalf of the
Respondent