suit lands to Rajamma at the time of marriage by way of Pasupukunkuma.
(c) proof of gift deed supporting the gift by way of Pasupukunkuma ... Rajamma at the time of her marriage with Plaintiff No. 1 as Pasupukunkuma, but this question has been -dealt with as an incidental question while
tulas and cash of Rs. 500/-to the plaintiff towards her pasupukunkuma. Later Lachaiah brought one Neelam Lingaiah from Yerragudem Village and gave the defendant ... give the entire immovable properties belonging him to the defendant towards her pasupukunkuma because of the above said reason. The plaintiff was also present
joint family, to his sister at the time of marriage as pasupukunkuma and on the other hand claimed that the defendant was a trespasser. Having ... that is to say, when the gift was made by way of pasupukunkuma at the time of the marriage it cannot be relied upon
cents was given to Giduturi
Gangayamma, W/o Matayya, towards Pasupukunkuma. The said Gangayamma
is in possession and enjoyment of the property and the defendants ... plaint A schedule, an
extent of Ac. 1.00 cents was given as Pasupukunkuma to Giduturi Lakshmi, W/o
Ramamurthy, in the year
cents was given to Giduturi
Gangayamma, W/o Matayya, towards Pasupukunkuma. The said Gangayamma
is in possession and enjoyment of the property and the defendants ... plaint A schedule, an
extent of Ac. 1.00 cents was given as Pasupukunkuma to Giduturi Lakshmi, W/o
Ramamurthy, in the year
plaintiff, three items of property
mentioned in the plaint schedule as 'Pasupukunkuma' while
performing the marriage with 2nd plaintiff. Possession was also
handed ... what is given to daughter by
defendant no.1 in 'pasupukunkuma'. He would further submit
that as document was already marked
plaintiff, three items of property
mentioned in the plaint schedule as 'Pasupukunkuma' while
performing the marriage with 2nd plaintiff. Possession was also
handed ... what is given to daughter by
defendant no.1 in 'pasupukunkuma'. He would further submit
that as document was already marked
share in the properties to the 1st plaintiff as
2
pasupukunkuma and he used to manage the said properties.
The gold of the 1st plaintiff ... declared to give half of his property to the 1st plaintiff as
pasupukunkuma. The 1st defendant adopted his brother's son
who was aged
father at the time of her marriage by way of Pasupukunkuma. In fact that is the crux of the problem as the said land
registered document
executed to meet the demand for not even a pasupukunkuma gift
to sister or daughter to give to brother-in-law at time
