decide the same, the observations of the Supreme Court in
Patel Engineering case (supra) are that the Chief Justice, under 11(6)
usually pronounces ... Tribunal has to decide
the disputes on merits. The observations in Patel Engineering case (supra)
are relevant and set out herein below:
"32. Moreover
facts of the present case and that
decided by the Supreme Court in the case of Patel Engineering Co. Ltd.
(supra), relied upon ... this submission by
referring to Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. (supra) in the following words:
"42. In Patel Engineering, MANU/SC/0024/2001 :
[2001]1SCR352
feature of cases of this nature
and Alopi Parshad case [(1960) 2 SCR 793 : AIR 1960
SC 588] and also Patel Engg. case
Judge cites the dictum of
the Supreme Court in the case titled Patel Engineering Limited vs. Union
of India & Anr. reported ... case does not hold-up to any of the
criteria laid down by the Supreme Court inter-alia in the case of Patel
Engineering Limited
covered by the IPC s 19 to 32."
32. The case law reported as K.N. Sathyapalan vs State of Kerala ... That is the
distinguishing feature of cases of this nature and Alopi
Parshad case and also Patel Engg. Case. As was
pointed
That is the
distinguishing feature of cases of this nature and Alopi Parshad case and
also Patel Engg. case."
51. This principle was reiterated
obligations. That is the distinguishing feature of cases of this
nature and Alopi Parshad case [ Alopi Parshad & Sons
Ltd. v. Union ... India , (1960) 2 SCR 793 : AIR 1960 SC 588]
and also Patel Engg. case [State of U.P. v. Patel Engg
Dda vs M/S Sportina Payce Infrastructure Pvt ... on 4 March, 2024
Author: Sachin Datta
That is the distinguishing feature of cases of this nature and Alopi Parshad
case and also Patel Engg. case."
48. This principle was reiterated
Dda vs M/S Sportina Payce Infrastructure Pvt ... on 4 March, 2024
Author: Sachin Datta
