pathway, a fence was put up.
However, the Commissioner could not find any fence
separating the pathway. The commissioner calculated the
width of the pathway ... reducing its width. Therefore, this
Court is of the definite view that the courts below have
erroneously fixed the width of the pathway
pathway, a fence was put up.
However, the Commissioner could not find any fence
separating the pathway. The commissioner calculated the
width of the pathway ... reducing its width. Therefore, this
Court is of the definite view that the courts below have
erroneously fixed the width of the pathway
wide
pathway. However, it granted a decree declaring that the pathway is a
common pathway with a width of 4.7 feet on the north ... pathway and not about the existence
of the pathway or its length. The plaintiff seeks a right of pathway over a
width
width of the way was increased from
3 - 3.35 to the width of 8 feet width and the defendants have
been using the said pathway ... prescription over the pathway having a
width of 8 feet. Even assuming that the width of the pathway
was increased subsequent to 2005, the defendant
width of 3 links. The plaintiff filed the suit after demolishing
the survey stones and after enhancing the width of the
pathway to 2 meters ... width of pathway mentioned
therein is having a width of 3 links. The width of pathway is
not stated in Ext.A1 title deed
schedule pathway and also not to reduce the width of the
pathway.
3. The suit was resisted by the defendants
contending that the plaintiff ... Advocate
Commissioner reported that there was a pathway, the width
of which was found to be 2 feet. It was also reported that
the said
public will be permitted to use the two
meter width pathway provided for having access to Foot
Over bridge, after its completion. The public shall ... times have free and unobstructed access through the two
meter width pathway provided for public access to the
landing points of Foot Over bridge
item No.2 pathway..
2. Plaint schedule Item No.1 admittedly belongs to the
plaintiff. There exists a pathway having a width of 2.5 links ... have
access to the 2.5 links' width pathway. The pathway having a
width of 2.5 links was not being used by defendants
that the defendant started objecting to the user of 6 ft. width pathway, the plaintiff filed the suit ... land as a pathway, and so the plaintiff cannot claim the right of pathway, measuring 6 ft. width, since it will affect the defendant
court accepted case of
respondent No.1 regarding user of the pathway having width of eight
feet along item No.3 for more than ... width of the pathway passing through item No.2 as three feet.
It is difficult to think a pathway having width
