petitioner's
property. The 4th respondent claimed that the width of the
pathway was encroached upon by the petitioner and accordingly
proceedings were initiated
petitioner's
property. The 4th respondent claimed that the width of the
pathway was encroached upon by the petitioner and accordingly
proceedings were initiated
side of the pathway. The allegation
raised by the petitioners is that because of the encroachment of the pathway
by respondents ... Officer to identify the encroachment, if any, by
measuring the width of the pathway based on the Village records, etc. It is
submitted that they
land, which is lying as a pathway, having an extent of 50 metre
length and 3 metre width thereby making it impossible for the
petitioner
Rosamma Joseph vs State Of Kerala on 6 December, 2010
Author: T.R. Ramachandran Nair