width of its way is 2 = feet as provided
under Ext.A1. Holding that appellants are not
entitled to reduce the width of pathway ... original width of 2 = feet. It is made clear
that at the execution proceedings if it is found
that the width of the pathway
pathway shall be available to all the
properties. When respondents contended that the
pathway so provided is having a length of 22 metres
and width ... pathway.
On the other hand, both appellants and respondents
admitted that the pathway as provided was in
existence. When respondents contended that width
capacity as the Sub
Divisional Magistrate alleging that the width
of the pathway has been reduced by filling up a
portion of the thodu ... pathway
along the side of the puramboke thodu and the
pathway was encroached upon by the adjacent paddy
field owners and as the width
connection
through that pathway. On the eastern side of the pathway, there
was a compound wall separating the pathway and that pathway
is plaint ... 2011 3
width of the pathway and the pathway is now having a width of
12 links. It is contended that appellants have no right
2011 2
first respondent from closing down the pathway having a width
of four feet.
2. Learned Munsiff, on the evidence ... reduce the width of the pathway, which is
available to the appellant, namely, a pathway having four feet
width.
5. First respondent instituted the suit
Union he was given a personal right of
enjoyment of pathway having a width of 10 links
through the western side of the plaint schedule ... contended that on the western side of
this plot, a pathway having a width of 10 links was
reserved in favour of Gopala Pillai
pathway through that property and thereafter plaint schedule
property was purchased by appellant leaving a pathway having
three links width ... pathway and plaint schedule property with a three links
width of pathway is lying contiguously and the same has been
used by respondents and others
eastern side of the plaint schedule property there
was a pathway having a width of one and half feet
and while constructing the compound wall ... pathway and the
adjacent property owner on the eastern side of
pathway had also surrendered some extent of
property for the pathway and the appellants
Appellants in their written statement contended that a pathway having a width of 15 ft. was provided under Ext.A1 partition deed and appellants ... vehemently argued that as Ext.A1 does not provide that width of pathway is 3 ft. and report of Commissioner shows that the existing
Appellants in their written statement
contended that a pathway having a width of 15 ft.
was provided under Ext.A1 partition deed and
appellants ... vehemently
argued that as Ext.A1 does not provide that width
of pathway is 3 ft. and report of Commissioner
shows that the existing
