pathway in
question is a public pathway which is being used by
generations and the fact that the pathway in question is a
public pathway ... same is not a public
pathway. But according to the respondents, the pathway is a
public pathway having a width of 12 links. The above
pathway; that public had a right to go through the
pathway and that the attempt is only to widen the said pathway,
the counsel contends ... public
pathway or public right in respect of the pathway, but only about
Crl.M.C. No.4175 of 2008 3
the width
Pathrose Pappachan vs Ouseph Jose on 13 October, 2008
Author: Thomas P.Joseph
Bench: Thomas
) Sh. Jagdish Bhalla vs The State on 3 August, 2018
1
IN THE COURT OF
