wide
pathway. However, it granted a decree declaring that the pathway is a
common pathway with a width of 4.7 feet on the north ... pathway and not about the existence
of the pathway or its length. The plaintiff seeks a right of pathway over a
width
wide
pathway. However, it granted a decree declaring that the pathway is a
common pathway with a width of 4.7 feet on the north ... pathway and not about the existence
of the pathway or its length. The plaintiff seeks a right of pathway over a
width
width of pathway was 6ft. Though it
is elicited from defendant that there was no obstruction of
using pathway of 1½ ft. width passing through ... blocked 6ft. wide
pathway and also refers to existence of 1½ ft. wide
pathway. Without specifically stating which among two
pathways plaintiff was trying
pathway. The 6 th
defendant pleaded that the plaintiff had never used the “ABCDEF” pathway
and the plaintiff was using a different pathway. Accordingly, both ... established the
right of pathway, should have atleast ensured that the available pathway is
not disturbed and the 5 feet width pathway is maintained without
following
relief:
“(i) A decree for declaration that a 10' width
pathway is available on the north of plaintiffs' area that ... 1753 of 2022
of the 10' width pathway within the time frame and on
their failure, a decree to execute the same through Court
4798 of 2022
S.No.973 through East-West 15 feet width pathway situated in S.No.1004/2 at
North Valliyur Bit-I, Kottaiyadi ... situated in Survey No.973 measuring through East-West 15 feet width
pathway situated in Survey No.1004/2 at North Valliyur Bit-I, Kottaiyadi
petitioners are
satisfied, if status quo in relation to two feet width pathway
described as B schedule in the plaint is ordered till the disposal ... mistake in the commission
report regarding non-mentioning of the width of the pathway as
reasons for the judgment in CMA 73/2019, here
given with respect to specific width of way with an
express condition not to use the way exceeding the width
agreed and prohibiting from making ... intention of the parties
very clear that a 1 mtr. Width pathway has been granted to the
RSA No.47 of 2016
24
plaintiffs
land by expanding the existing pathway.
8. Infact the agreement of sale indicates that there
existed a pathway width of 4 to 5 feet ... clear that the petitioners essentially admitted
the existence of pathway of 4 to 5 feet width and had
offered to sell the adjacent portion
Justus are
having neighboring houses and there is a 2 feet width
pathway. So the petitioner purchased 168 Square links and
12 links vacant land