Plot No.2 by showing that
there was a 33 feet width pathway to Plot No.2 through Plot No.1,
thereby reducing the total
garden situated, next to the place of incident
and the width of the pathway where the incident stated
to have been taken place is about ... about four feet and in the
mahazar the width of the pathway is mentioned as two
feet. Therefore, there is inconsistency and contradictory
other
evidence to show as to how the 6ft. width of
pathway is necessary for them to reach the street.
As stated above, additional burden ... same
time, the respondent/plaintiff also cannot claim
6ft., width of pathway, which was not given under
Ex.A1 settlement deed
residing there along
with his family. There is a 5 feet width common pathway/passage comprised
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page ... proper planning approval and
totally encroached the above said 5 feet width common pathway. In this
regard, the petitioner made representations dated
manner
preventing the petitioner to use 15 feet width of land as pathway on
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ... petitioner wants the respondents to earmark the 15 feet
width pathway in Survey No.29/3 situated at Padamathur Village,
Sivagangai District. In the revenue
plots
and in between these 12 plots there is a 10ft., width pathway and all the
houses are having electricity service connection. However, the
defendants
trees.
3. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the public
pathway having width of four metres exists and in the four metres
pathway, teak ... hectares in favour of Manickam and nine others. A three metres
width cart pathway exists as per the field measurement book. The
pathway is used
action as against the said encroachment made in the 5 feet width
common pathway / street, which is running from South to North from Sriraji
Street ... dated 04.05.2018 and remove the encroachment made in the
5 feet width common pathway / street
respondents and the appellants have
agreed to leave 3 feet width pathway in the middle of
survey no.302 as shown in the accompanying hand
plaint indicates that
the plaintiff claims that a 20 feet width pathway is shown as the 3rd
schedule property. The defendant in Paragraph ... there are no averments in the written statement disputing the width of the
pathway in the 3rd schedule property.
3. The plaintiffs had filed
