over and above the easement of grant
over a 5 links width pathway, obtained by him through the
document, he was making ... metres width pathway
from 1979 onwards and thereby he is entitled to prescriptive
right of easement over a 3 metres width pathway. According
lying on the western side of the above said
2 feet width pathway belongs to the 1st defendant
towards the northern portion and the remaining ... said pathway is a public pathway. Apart from
clearing the bushes, which were there on the said
pathway having a width of 5 feet, there
infer that 20 feet width pathway was in existence and
it touches the land in S.F.No.312. But the Courts below also held ... third parties also purchased plots by
mentioning this 20 feet width pathway. Moreover the plaintiffs vendors had
also purchased three plots respectively through separate deeds
pathway or location of the pathway as used by them. She has no
idea about the user of the pathway or the manner ... identify the pathway or give description of the nature of the
pathway used by them, then it cannot be said that the pathway
claimed
pathway or location of the pathway as used by them. She has no
idea about the user of the pathway or the manner ... identify the pathway or give description of the nature of the
pathway used by them, then it cannot be said that the pathway
claimed
kols width is a private pathway or
a public pathway. When the existence of such a pathway
was acknowledged ... pathway or public pathway.
The 1st defendant has no case that the said portion covered
by Ext.A2 was lying as a pathway prior
kols width is a private pathway or
a public pathway. When the existence of such a pathway
was acknowledged ... pathway or public pathway.
The 1st defendant has no case that the said portion covered
by Ext.A2 was lying as a pathway prior
when he executed
Ext.A3 and when 18 links' width pathway was formed.
According to the learned senior counsel, at the time ... increase in the width.
Relying on Exts.C3 and C4, it was argued that at present,
the width of the pathway is more than
specifically mentioned regarding
width of the pathway, as one enables to take a car to the
rear portion of the property through it. It seems ... regarding the pathway clearly show that the width of
pathway was not intended to be 1.5 meter alone; whereas it
was an addition of land
plaintiffs are
entitled to have the plaint C schedule pathway having a
width of 12 feet as an easement by grant. The properties
were ... originally a width of 12 feet as claimed. The
grant made in Ext.A4 does not reveal the width of the
pathway. Presently
