array. It is
further contended that there is a five feet width pathway from the
northern end of the plaint schedule property passing through ... defendants
that there exists a five feet width pathway in the plaint schedule
property is not proved and further that the defendants do not claim
over and above the easement of grant
over a 5 links width pathway, obtained by him through the
document, he was making ... metres width pathway
from 1979 onwards and thereby he is entitled to prescriptive
right of easement over a 3 metres width pathway. According
that the pathway with 6 feet width belongs to the plaintiffs and the remaining 2 feet width pathway belongs to the defendants. The agreement further ... maintaining 8 feet width pathway and seeking a prohibitory injunction to restrain construction over the common pathway having 8 feet width and also seeking
pathway in
question is a public pathway which is being used by
generations and the fact that the pathway in question is a
public pathway ... same is not a public
pathway. But according to the respondents, the pathway is a
public pathway having a width of 12 links. The above
report that the plaint schedule pathway is an
unpaved pathway which is approximately hundred feet long. The
current width of the pathway is such that ... said pathway due to lack of
adequate width. The report has stated that the width of the pathway
in the middle of the pathway
pathway is in existence along the line of the C schedule pathway. The
defendant is also using the said pathway as access to his residence ... width of 1.4 metre, it is only
just and proper to conclude that the width of plaint C schedule pathway is
the width
width of the
beaten track is only 30 cms. At any rate, only a width of 2 feet is
sufficient for a pathway which ... existence of Plaint C
schedule pathway. Plaint C schedule pathway is shown as
having 3 Meters width and 48 Meters length. The existence
that the vendor of the plaint schedule property
left 1 m. width pathway on the north-eastern side of the
plaint schedule property for ingress ... stated.
The pathway identified in Ext.C1 is not the pathway
claimed by the defendants. According to the
commissioner, the pathway starts from
width of its way is 2 = feet as provided
under Ext.A1. Holding that appellants are not
entitled to reduce the width of pathway ... original width of 2 = feet. It is made clear
that at the execution proceedings if it is found
that the width of the pathway
lying on the western side of the above said
2 feet width pathway belongs to the 1st defendant
towards the northern portion and the remaining ... said pathway is a public pathway. Apart from
clearing the bushes, which were there on the said
pathway having a width of 5 feet, there
