accounts of both firms, inter-alia, in ticket bookings, online
shopping, Paytm recharges, purchasing from unknown parties, online
transfers to vendors, contractors and individuals
from the possession of this petitioner, two e-wallets, namely,
mtabzo and paytm were created. Paytm e-wallet so created is in the name
messaged him that he will transfer Rs.2,300/- on Paytm wallet
and in lieu of that the complainant need to transfer ... complainant but he did not
transfer Rs.2,300/- on his Paytm wallet.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant
is an innocent person
allegation is of transferring
money electronically from account of several persons by Paytm and E-wallet
which was done by Rohit
that
the money from the account of the informant was transferred to Paytm (e-
wallet) and thereafter the same was transferred to the account ... transferred
fraudulently from the account of the informant was sent to Paytm (e-wallet)
and thereafter the same was transferred in the account of Kishan
implication and that the
petitioner's bank account was connected with PAYTM, on-line
marketing application which provides a platform to its users ... line transaction, marketing in fact the PAYTM floated a
bonus scheme which was used by the petitioner and huge
amount came into account. The Branch
accused were indulging in sale
of Sim Cards which were activated with Paytm on the basis of
forged documents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner
accused were indulging in sale
of Sim Cards which were activated with Paytm on the basis of
forged documents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner
accused were indulging in sale
of Sim Cards which were activated with Paytm on the basis of
forged documents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner
amount from the
complainants in the name of either giving franchisees of PayTM or
giving employment to the complainants. According to the prosecution
case
