Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [in short "the PCA"]. Contending that there are no materials on record to frame charges against ... interlocutory order" as found in Section 19 (3) (c) of the PCA came to be considered by this Court. A learned single Judge
impugned order') passed by respondent no.2
(the Police Complaint Authority - PCA). By the impugned order, the
PCA rejected the contention that the FIRs ... detention was even prior to the registration of an FIR.
4. PCA had considered the aforesaid contentions and rejected the
same. Insofar as the registration
Sharma, it is held that in terms of Section 19 (3)
(c) PCA, no revision petition would be maintainable in
the High Court against order ... reproduce the same:
"28. ... the opening words of Section 27 PCA are
"subject to the provisions of this Act...." Clearly,
therefore, Section
2013 COMPLAINT, CHARGE SHEET AND THE
ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN (PCA)
CC.NO.13/2014 PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL.DIST ... MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Petitioner is arraigned as accused No.2 in (PCA)
CC.No.13/2014 for offences punishable under Sections
praying to set aside the
orders dated 25.04.2012 passed in Spl. Case (PCA)
No.11/2011 on the file of the Prl. District & Sessions ... articles seized during the course of investigation in
connection with Spl.C.(PCA) No.11/2011, which case
3
had been registered by the respondent
PASSED BY THE PRL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS
JUDGE, CHITRADURGA IN SPL.C.(PCA) NO.11/2011 & ETC.
2
CRL.RP NO.37/2013
BETWEEN ... PASSED BY THE PRL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS
JUDGE, CHITRADURGA IN SPL.C.(PCA) NO.11/2011 & ETC.
CRL.RP NO.38/2013
BETWEEN
The State Of Karnataka vs Nagendra on 12 April, 2022
KABC010262302018
IN THE COURT OF
The State Of Karnataka Represented vs Mr.Basavraju B.G on 15 October, 2022
KABC10105322018
The State Of Karnataka Represented vs Mr. Rajashekar on 24 January, 2023
KABC010073942018
IN THE
The State Of Karnataka Represented vs Mr. Srinivas on 3 January, 2023
KABC010194072017
IN THE
