power exercisable by Principal Controller of defense Accounts (P) (in short PCDA(P)) while dealing with the request of the member of the Armed Forces ... favor of the petitioner, the respondents still persist with the view that PCDA(P) can ignore the findings of the Medical Board duly forwarded
forwarded to
Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension), Allahabad (for short
'PCDA(P)') who, however, declined the relief of disability pension ... contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner
that the PCDA(P) did not get the petitioner re-examined by any medical
board
Krishna Nand Lal, resident of C-84, Yamuna Vihar, PCDA (P) Colony, Allahabad.
2. Pankaj Kumar, aged about 35 years, son of Shri ... Onkar Deo resident of B-60 Yamuna Vihar, PCDA (P) Colony, Allahabad.
3. B.N. Jha, aged about 35 years, son of Shri
February, 2005. On 18th February, 2005, the petitioner was informed that PCDA(P) had assessed disability of the petitioner at less than ... contended on behalf of the petitioner that PCDA(P) had no authority or jurisdiction to sit over the opinion of the medical board which
assessed at 20%. Accordingly, pension case of the petitioner was submitted to PCDA (P) Allahabad for adjudication vide Army Corps Records letter No. l050155 ... dated 18.03.19.96.
2. As per the stand of the respondents PCDA(P) Allahabad adjudicated upon the case in consultation with Medical Advisor (Pension
Pension Disbursement Office (DPDO) under Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension) Allahabad (PCDA) or to draw pension from any of PSU/Private Bank approved ... name of the Complainant. Having left with no option the Complainant informed PCDA on 19.08.2013 to redress his grievance as the PDA was not forthcoming
aged 61 years, R/o # No. 874, Sector 9, Panchkula (Retired from PCDA(WC) Chandigarh).
2. Harjeet Singh Sodhi, IDAS, ACDA (Retd ... Sector 48-A, Chandigarh (Retired from PCDA(WC), Chandigarh).
3. Mahendra Kumar Malik, Senior Accounts Officer (Retd), Account No. 8308890, R/o # No. 1922, Phase
Pcda (R&D) vs Sirius Global Ltd on 17 August, 2020
Author: Najmi Waziri
Bench: Najmi Waziri
$~10
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... 2020, CM APPL. 13743/2020 (stay) & CM APPL.
13744/2020 (exemption)
PCDA (R&D) ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. D.S. Mehandru, Advocate.
versus
SIRIUS
years and the same was considered aggravated by military service.
However, the PCDA(P), Allahabad accepted his disability at the rate of
20% for five ... years and granted him disability element of pension.
Since the decision of PCDA(P), Allahabad was to the benefit of the
respondent, as such
authority. The Principal
Controller of the Defence Accounts (Pensions) [for
short, 'PCDA(P)] reduced the same to less than 20%.
Percentage of disability ... pension for this
intermittent period is arbitrary.
Learned counsel states that the
PCDA(P) over-ruled the assessment made by the
medical authorities
