against giving of bribe. Therefore, he procured a secret
pen camera and on 22.09.2009 Patwari Raj Kumar Yadav and Naib
Tehsildar Rajbir came ... Corruption Branch. He
deposed that on 01.07.2010 in his presence one pen camera was
handed over to the IO by one counselor whose name
Thereafter, the complainant visited the
house of the accused with a pen camera and after negotiation, he paid ... that point of time,
the 2nd respondent by using his pen camera is stated to have captured the
conversation and handing over of the money
shadow witness and watch the happenings
and to report later. Pen camera and voice recorder were
fixed to P.W.1 with instructions to switch ... seized and shirt was also seized and the complainant
produced Pen camera and voice recorder and the recordings
were played
call in voice
recorder and the recordings in voice recorder, button camera,
pen camera at different stage of the case are all marked ... Office wherein pen camera, button
camera and voice recorder was played and it was found that
nothing was recorded in button camera
recording of the
same nor the IO has seized the Pen Camera and Voice Recorder and
even otherwise, the complainant is not visible ... collect evidence as against Chatter Singh, he has not
seized the Pen Camera and Voice Recorder, IO has not recorded the
Statement of independent official
their notice and the same has
been recorded in the pen camera. Unwilling to pay
bribe amount, he approached Lokayuktha police
station and lodged ... show cause notice.
The said conversation has been recorded in his pen
camera and then the contents are transferred
signal
by folding left sleeves of his shirt and was given pen camera
and voice recorder with instruction to switch-on the same while
meeting ... gave report as per Ex.P.9. The
recordings in pen camera and voice recorder were transcribed
12 Spl.C.No.66/2014
used one MP3 player (which had since been
"destroyed"), pen camera and one mobile phone Nokia E90 (both of
which
argued that the
proceedings of recording allegedly made by use of
pen camera during Ex.P.5 (recovery mahazar) is
purported to have been downloaded ... page
No.21, when the primary evidence i.e., pen
camera/recording device has not been produced
and marked as material object, in the absence
The State Of Karnataka vs H.T. Chandrashekar on 9 August, 2021
1
Spl.CC
