Nazar vs State By on 4 April, 2007
IPC
A-7 and A-8 - Section 302 r/w S.109 IPC
A-1 to A-8 - Sec.396 ... guilty under Section 302 IPC, without any difficulty, he can be
found guilty under Section 302 IPC and the life imprisonment
Search Results Page
Search Results
161 - 170 of 9845 (2.60 seconds)Laliya And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 July, 1966
convicting the first three appellants for offence under Section 396. Indian Penal Code , and sentencing them to ten years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine ... commits murder in so committing dacoity" used in Section 396 , Indian Penal Code. Courts have had occasions in various cases to interpret Section 396
Sri Venkatesha vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 January, 2024
accused under Section 396
of IPC. Hence, Section 396 read with Section 109 of IPC
attracts against this petitioner. Section 109 of IPC ... charged independently for the offence under Section 396 read
with Section 109 of IPC. Therefore, the Trial Court ought to
have altered the charges
The State Of Karnataka By vs Syed Nadeem @ Chuvi on 5 May, 2021
accused and thereby the accused
has committed an offence punishable under
section 396 of I.P.C. ?
3. Whether the prosecution proves beyond all
reasonable ... five or
more persons. Hence, the offence under section 396 of
IPC is not attract to the accused. Therefore, the
prosecution has failed
State By Basavanagudi Police Station vs A.1 Dodda Hanuma on 28 February, 2015
alleging
commission of offences punishable U/sec.302 and 394 of Indian
Penal code. (for short IPC ).
The case of the prosecution in brief ... Cr.P.C . filed on behalf of the accused. Then the charge was framed
for the alleged offence punishable under Section 396 of IPC
State vs Manoj Kumar Shah on 16 February, 2024
IPC
P. S. Karol Bagh
State vs. Manoj Kuma Shah & Anr.
However u/Sec. 391 IPC 'dacoity' and Section 396 ... Section 397 IPC. Section 392 and Section 390 IPC are couched in
different words. In Sections 390 , 394 , 397 and 398 IPC
State vs Md. Faizan @ Sameer And Anr on 14 November, 2025
weapon......' can be punished. However u/Sec. 391
IPC 'dacoity' and Section 396 IPC which is dacoity and murder
then ... Section 397 IPC. Section 392 and Section 390 IPC are couched
in different words. In Sections 390 , 394 , 397 and 398 IPC
State vs Harender Passi on 27 March, 2018
Mundka for the offences
punishable under Sections 302 / 201 / 395 / 396 of the
Indian Panel Code, 1860 ( IPC ). Accused namely,
Birja ... Manoj for commission of offences
punishable under section 302 / 201 / 34 IPC and
under section 395 / 396 IPC. Vide same order,
charge
State vs 1. Neeraj @ Karan on 16 July, 2016
committed the
offence. After these statements, Sec. 394 / 34 IPC was converted to Sec. 396 IPC.
SC No. 285/2016 State Vs. Neeraj ... Vikas and Sonu @ Matka for the offences punishable u/s
302 / 307 / 397 / 396 / 34 IPC. Separate proceedings were filed against the remaining
State vs Sushil Kumar Etc on 27 January, 2026
Sahpau, District-Hathras, U.P.
6. Offence Complained of Section 120B IPC
Section 396 / 34 IPC
Section 302 / 34 IPC
Section ... Kumar, Khushal Pal Singh, Ram
Kishan and Languria under Section 120B IPC Section 396 / 34
IPC Section 302 / 34 IPC Section