Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 75 (1.21 seconds)

Vikram vs State on 9 October, 2015

under Section 302 and also for offence of robbery under section 392 IPC. In the present case, charges were framed under Section 396 ... could be convicted under Section 302 IPC as murder is one of the ingredients of an offence under Section 396 IPC. It was noted that
Delhi High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Mohd. Salman on 16 May, 2019

Mohd. Nadeem were arrested in case FIR No.381/2016 under Section 396 IPC, Police Station Anand Parbat. Pursuant to the same, the accused Mohd ... present case were arrested in case FIR No. 381/2016 under Section 396 IPC, P.S. Anand Parbat which is Ex.C­12 (Colly
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 28 January, 2012

against accused Lakhinder @ Raju and Mohd. Shokat in respect of offence U/S 396 IPC . Alternatively, charge was also framed U/S 302 read with ... five persons in crime, I am of the considered view that Section 396 IPC is attracted in this case. It is very much likely that
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 25 January, 2010

been sent to face trial for the commission of offence punishable U/s 396/449/412 IPC & 25/27 Arms Act by the police ... succumbed to injuries and died and thereby committed an offence punishable U/s 396 IPC and within my cognizance. (2) Separate charges for the offence
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Raju @ Ikram on 12 September, 2022

order on charge was pronounced and charge for offence punishable under Section 396 IPC was framed against the accused namely Raju @ Ikram for commission ... that accused namely Raju @ Ikram is guilty for offence punishable under Section 396 IPC. Hence, accused Raju @ Ikram is hereby acquitted of the charge framed
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next