Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 228 (0.98 seconds)

State vs . Tej Kumar @ Tinku on 4 March, 2014

pant and thereafter he committed sodomy with him by inserting his penis in his anus. Consequently, he started weeping. It was further alleged that ... rectum of victim. It was submitted that had the full penis been inserted as deposed by the victim, there would have been some injuries
Delhi District Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Dashrath Sharma on 22 September, 2014

Dashrath Sharma accused was sitting and her daughter was at the penis of accused, which is not the prosecution case. It was further contended that ... that lungi of accused was down and her daughter was at his penis and further deposed that accused was not wearing any underwear. During cross
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ilyasuddin vs State on 21 January, 2014

pant and underwear were pulled down and his penis was protruding out and semen was also seen on his penis. Underneath the legs of Ilyasuddin ... revealed as Ilyasuddin. His pant and underwear were pulled down and penis was protruding out. There were bite marks on the lips and neck
Delhi High Court Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - S Gupta - Full Document

State vs . Ram Bhawan on 20 May, 2014

victim showing that there was insertion of penis or penis like object in the anal canal which is very FIR No. 272/11 Page ... finger was painful. Final opinion of PW9­ was that the insertion of penis or penis like object into the anal canal was likely. Hence, this
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next