Rajeeta Patel @ Rajita Patel vs The State Of Bihar on 12 October, 2020
Rajeeta Patel @ Rajita Patel vs The State Of Bihar on 12 October, 2020
Equivalent citations
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1338 (0.98 seconds)Sumeet Bajwa vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 12 January, 2016
facilities for the exercise of
right to procreation during incarceration?
The penological interest of the State ought to permit the
creation of facilities ... right is not an
absolute right and is subject to the penological interests of
the State."
The Court also gave certain directions, which reads
Neha vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 27 January, 2022
facilities for the exercise of right to
procreation during incarceration?
The penological interest of the State ought to permit the
creation of facilities ... right is not an absolute right and is
subject to the penological interests of the State.
5 of 12
::: Downloaded
Ashwin Bansi Sapkale Through His Wife ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 9 March, 2022
facilities for the
exercise of right to procreation during
incarceration?
The penological interest of the State ought to
permit the creation of facilities ... right is not an absolute right and is
subject to the penological interests of the
State.
4. In the light of the above, Punjab
Maru Ram Etc. Etc vs Union Of Lndia & Anr on 11 November, 1980
showered arguments against the privative
provision (s. 433A) as constitutional anathema and
penological atavism, incompetent for Parliament and
violative of fundamental rights and reformatory goals ... conflict between the freedom of the
individual and any other rights or interests, then no
matter how great or powerful those others
Mohammad Giasuddin vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 May, 1977
undue cruelty but by re-culturisation. Therefore, the focus
of interest in penology is the individual, and goal is
salvaging him for society. The infliction
Maru Ram And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 11 November, 1980
showered arguments against the privative provision (Section 433A) as constitutional anathema and penological atavism, incompetent for Parliament and violative of fundamental rights and reformatory goals ... conflict between the freedom of the individual and any other rights or interests, then no matter how great or powerful those others
Ramshankar Singh And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. on 19 January, 2021
undue cruelty but by re-culturization. Therefore, the focus of interest in penology in the individual and the goal is salvaging him for the society
Pintu Gupta vs State Of U.P. on 28 July, 2022
undue cruelty but by reculturization. Therefore, the focus of interest in penology in the individual and the goal is salvaging him for the society
Shakuntala Devi vs State on 6 December, 1995
measure of social defense and individual rehabilitation. The focus of interest in penology is the individual and the goal is salvaging him for society. Time