Regulations and to direct the respondents to grant the pensionary benefits.
4. Statement of objections is filed on behalf of first respondent stating that since ... stipulated time under the Regulations, he is not entitled to the pensionary benefits and hence it has sought for dismissal of the Writ Petition. Statement
Basavana Goud
JUDGMENT
R.P. Sethi, C.J.
1. Denial of pensionary benefits under the Regulations framed by the appellant-Banks in the year ... aforesaid date they were not eligible for pension. The denial of pensionary benefits forced the concerned retired employees to make representations and thereafter file
required to be taken into account for computing the
pensionary benefits?
(3) Whether the appointment of the petitioner to the Executive Grade by means ... should be taken into account for the purpose of computing the pensionary benefits? To consider this question, it is useful to refer to Regulations
ordered to be recovered
from the pensionary benefits of the petitioner on the
ground that over payment has been made on wrong
fixation ... recover a sum of Rs.1,83,528/-
from the pensionary benefits of the petitioner as he has
been wrongly granted one additional increment
years to 58 years vide GO dated 24.8.1984. The revised pensionary benefits were extended in GO dated 20.9.1984 to those employees who had retired before ... statute. Hence, the benefit of GO dated 20.9.1984 will not enure to the benefit of the petitioners for pensionary benefits as claimed by them
entitled to the benefits as given to them under the Act,
since such a benefit is far more than the benefit under the
settlement. Reliance ... employees cannot take benefit of both the Acts.
The petitioners herein do not seek benefit from both the
sources. The benefit is being sought
Settlement dated 31.07.1999, employees of
KPTCL were entitled to pension and pensionary benefits as
applicable to employees of the Government of Karnataka.
4. According ... clause XVIII (b), it was made
clear that the pensionary benefits would be regulated as
prevailing in the State Government. In the meanwhile the
Government
between Government Aided Educational Institution and Teacher regarding delayed payment of pensionary benefits-whether State Government is liable to pay interest for the delayed settlement ... pensionary benefits payable to retired employees-Which Government order is applicable-1994 Government order or 2004 Government Order-Whether fastening of liability to pay interest
Service Rules and
conditions, which specifically do not provide for
any pensionary benefits; the Governing Council of
WALMI has adopted the Maharashtra Civil Services
Rules ... policy decision in
the year 2005 not to extend the pensionary
benefits to the employees of the aided institutes,
boards, corporations etc.; and the proposal
Service Rules and
conditions, which specifically do not provide for
any pensionary benefits; the Governing Council of
WALMI has adopted the Maharashtra Civil Services
Rules ... policy decision in
the year 2005 not to extend the pensionary
benefits to the employees of the aided institutes,
boards, corporations etc.; and the proposal
