OTHERS , (2015) 12
SCC 420 (PARA 20 AND 21), dated 31.03.2015.
12. PEPSI FOODS LTD. AND ANOTHER,
v. SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AND
OTHERS ... mechanical process or matter of course. As held by
this Court in Pepsi Foods Ltd. (1998) 5 SCC 749, to
set in motion the process
passed an order on
27.02.2004. It placed reliance on the decision in Pepsi Foods Ltd. v.
Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh [1], and held that ... flavour and receipt of royalty and service charges. Reliance on the Pepsi
Foods Ltd. (supra) was seriously criticised before the tribunal as the
ratio laid
Pepsi Co Inc. vs Sri Syed Ghaziddin on 26 October, 2022
Bench: P Naveen Rao , G.Radha Rani
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE ... world renowned manufacturers
and sellers of beverages under the trade marks Pepsi, Mirinda, 7UP,
Aquafina etc. The various companies of the plaintiffs all over
world renowned manufacturers
and sellers of beverages under the trade marks Pepsi, Mirinda, 7UP,
Aquafina etc. The various companies of the plaintiffs all over ... prior users of the same.
11.4. The defendants further submitted that when Pepsi's products
were tested, they were found to contain pesticides
passed an
order on 27.02.2004. It placed reliance on the decision in
Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise,
Reportable
Chandigarh1 , and held that ... flavour and receipt of royalty and service
charges. Reliance on the Pepsi Foods Ltd. (supra) was
seriously criticised before the tribunal as the ratio laid
substantiate this
contention, the appellant relied on the decisions
in Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Special Judicial
Magistrate [Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Special Judicial
Magistrate ... decision of this Court in Pepsi Foods [Pepsi
Foods Ltd. v. Special Judicial Magistrate , (1998) 5 SCC 749 :
1998 SCC (Cri) 1400] , arose
proprietorship concern engaged in the business of
manufacturing, marketing and selling of Pepsi, Sharbat,
juice and cold-drinks since long as household business ... business of Pep cee with the trademark
SHEETAL PEPCEE and MAYUR PEPSY, which is identical and
deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trademark. That
business of manufacturing and selling of soft drinks in agreement with "Pepsi". It is registered under the Central Sales ... with the condition that the storage would be restricted to Pepsi products only and that the distributors were to use Visicoolers as the soft drinks
Senior Counsel
would rely on State of Bihar v. Rambalak Singh and Pepsi
Foods Ltd. v. Special Judicial Magistrate .
When both W.P. Nos.36232 ... process of
Court or to otherwise secure the ends of justice, (Pepsi Foods
Ltd.2; State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal ), or to ensure cleanliness
Tata Sons Private Limited & Anr. vs Puro Wellness Private Limited & Anr. on 10
