being permitted to load and unload even the
perishable goods from the platform of the Howrah
station. This is posing a practical difficulty since ... agreeable at least to load/unload up
to 5 tonnes of perishable goods, out of the total
amount of 24 tonnes available to the petitioner
date of departure. It is submitted
that the perishable goods, as per definition, shall
perish/be damaged unless they are loaded/unloaded
within close proximity ... thereby facing financial loss
since even five tonnes of perishable goods are not
being able to be loaded/unloaded.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents
defendant was not allowed by the
plaintiffs to remove its perishable goods and other office
equipment from the premises which caused substantial
pecuniary loss ... claimant to
remove its equipment and goods from the premises
including perishable goods which has caused substantial
pecuniary loss to the claimant. The plaintiffs further
Iranian Origin. It also was wondering as
to why such perishable goods from Chile is
being imported and as to why such goods are
being ... goods: Provided that where it is not practicable
to seize any such goods, the proper officer may serve on
the owner of the goods
extent that the petitioner may be
allowed to load and unload perishable goods to the extent
of 5 tonnes from the platform of Howrah Station ... drawn between the VPs
and SLRs at least in respect of perishable goods is
unreasonable and cannot be justified.
In view of the decision taken
extent that the petitioner may be
allowed to load and unload perishable goods to the extent
of 5 tonnes from the platform of Howrah Station ... drawn between the VPs
and SLRs at least in respect of perishable goods is
unreasonable and cannot be justified.
This Court, too, has passed similar
extent that the petitioner may be
allowed to load and unload perishable goods to the extent
of 5 tonnes from the platform of Howrah Station ... drawn between the VPs
and SLRs at least in respect of perishable goods is
unreasonable and cannot be justified.
In view of the decision taken
said case was in relation to the
damage caused to perishable goods loaded in a ship
headed towards Liverpool. Compensation was sought on
the ground
possession the goods
were seized, an option to pay a fine, in lieu of confiscation. Thus, in the case of
prohibited goods, the discretion ... prompt in
exercise of such discretion, particularly in the case of perishable goods such as
the commodity in question. The consignments are in the Customs
imported goods and there must
be an expedited decision on such application. This would
ensure that the imported goods which are perishable are
not lost ... provisional
release of the imported goods and by directing expedited
decision on such application, since the subject goods are
perishable in nature. In the light