Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 682 (1.04 seconds)

Vishal Gupta vs Smt. Arti Gupta on 4 April, 2017

amount of Rs.7,50,000/- as permanent alimony to the respondent, though the petition filed by the appellant-husband under Section ... well as factual error in granting the above mentioned decree for permanent alimony and stridhan. No any application under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Manu Goyal vs Smt. Aditi Goel on 18 July, 2017

respondent under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage seeking permanent alimony has been dismissed and custody of minor child has been given to the respondent ... raised a claim for permanent custody of the child and since she has raised the claim for permanent alimony under Section 25 or any relief
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manoj Pati vs Anjali Nayak on 8 September, 2017

wife, namely, Anjali Nayak (respondent herein) and her daughter towards permanent alimony and maintenance. The appellant in this case essentially challenges the quantum of permanent ... lump sum amount of Rs.7.00 lakh as permanent alimony and maintenance to the wife and daughter is excessive, unreasonable and patently illegal. Hence
Orissa High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - I Mahanty - Full Document

Sangita Rastogi D/O Ved Prakash Arya vs Rakeshkumar Rastogi S/O Shyamkishor ... on 13 April, 2017

enhanced the maintenance to Rs. 15000/­ per  month by way of permanent alimony, which came to be set aside  along with judgment and decree, still ... respondent husband also  challenged   the   order   of   permanent   alimony   at   the   rate   of   Rs.  15,000/­ per month which also technically can be said
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Umanatha B vs Smt Padmavathi on 13 July, 2017

between the parties and further directed the appellant herein to pay permanent alimony of Rs.5 lakhs to the respondent within three months from ... direction can be issued to the appellant to pay the permanent alimony to the respondent. The Family Court mechanically passed the order impugned herein, observing
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next