Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1218 (0.87 seconds)

Ghanshyan Indravadan Pandya vs University Engineer on 2 April, 2018

Annexure­A to  the petition) by which the petitioner is blacklisted permanently.  Page 1 of 21 C/SCA/11979/2016 CAV JUDGMENT [2.0] The facts ... communication dated 13.06.2016, the petitioner is informed that  the petitioner is blacklisted permanently from doing any work with  the University.  [2.2] Feeling   aggrieved   and   dissatisfied
Gujarat High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Bharat Construction Company vs Vadodara Municipal Corporation on 6 December, 2018

Corporation passed the impugned order/resolution by which the petitioner is permanently blacklisted. The petitioner has, therefore, challenged the said order by filing the present ... power to blacklist the petitioner under certain circumstances, the order of permanent blacklisting cannot be passed. In support of the said contention, learned advocate
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 2 - V M Pancholi - Full Document

Maru vs State on 27 December, 2011

before passing the order of blacklisting. It is also not disputed that the blacklisting of the petitioner is permanent, and not for any particular period ... blacklisting, the blacklisted person would also face a loss of reputation and prestige which would affect his other business dealings. An order of blacklisting that
Gujarat High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A Kumari - Full Document

Jitendra Singh Tomar vs State Of M.P. on 30 October, 2025

under the garb of a purported suspension, the petitioner has been permanently blacklisted, as no time period for the suspension of the registration ... grossly disproportionate and excessively harsh as it amount to permanent debarment/blacklisting. Permanent blacklisting incurs ineligibility from participation in tender proceedings of other government functionaries
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next