B. Rama Krishna Reddy vs S.B.S.Y.M. Degree College Rep. By Its ... on 27 September, 1995
locality for purchase of land for the purpose of constructing a permanent building for the college in Mydukur. He made detailed reference to this aspect
Search Results Page
Search Results
91 - 100 of 82882 (5.27 seconds)T.R. Appaswami Aiyangar vs Narayanaswami Aiyar And Ors. on 28 March, 1930
recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Thurston v. Nottingham Permanent Benefit Building Society (1902) 1 Ch. 1.
18. Then they cite a passage ... deed. Coutts Trotter, J., in referring to the case in Nottingham Permanent Benefit Building Society v. Thurstan (1903) A.C. 6 and Mohori Bibee
Rama Chandra Misra vs President, District Board on 21 August, 1950
both operate without either interfering with the other ?" Tabernacle Permanent Building Society V. John Knight
T.A. Meenakshi Sundarammal And Anr. vs K. Subramania Ayyar And Ors. on 27 November, 1953
known judgment of Vaughan Williams J. in 'Jones v. Merionethshire Permanent Benefit Building Society', 1891-2 Ch 587 (F). The learned Judge ... seek his own advantage." (24) In -- 'Jones v. Merionethshire Permanent Benefit - Building Society', 1892-1 Ch 173 (G), Lindley L. J. pointed
A. Duraiswami vs A. Arumugham on 21 March, 1997
waste which has reduced the value and utility of the building permanently.
3. The said allegations were seriously opposed by the revision petitioner ... building:
(ii) if the tenant used the building in such a manner as to destroy or reduce its value or utility materially and permanently
Bangalore Timber Industries And Others vs Madras Sapper Ex-Servicemen'S ... on 10 September, 1987
National Permanent Building society [1869] 5 LR Ch App. 309. It is true that a winding up order is not a normal alternative
Francis vs Davis on 1 August, 2005
common
front elevation of the building have caused much change
to the building. The main building consists of ten
identical rooms and now the front ... destroy or
reduce the value or utility of the building materially
and permanently in the point of view of the landlord;
while in the point
Smt. Y. Anasuya vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By ... on 26 March, 1993
Executive Engineer (R&B) (in the case of permanent cinema building only) asking for their reports and certificates within thirty days from the date ... application for renewal of a licence (in respect of a permanent cinema building), which is made three months in advance of the expiry
Angammal vs M.M.S. Aslami Sahib on 28 April, 1913
these cases is that when permission is given to construct the permanent building in question, such consent being deducible from the terms of the instrument ... which has been, constructed, and in particular a permanent building which cannot be removed without material loss to him, what is the inference
Dipika Arvindkumar Pancholi vs State Of Gujarat And Anr. on 9 October, 2002
child-a luckless orphan of the law (In re Leicester permanent Building Society, 1942 Ch. 340. Same was the view of Devlin