Narayan Hari Tarkhande vs Yeshwant Raoji Naik on 20 March, 1928
Narayan Hari Tarkhande vs Yeshwant Raoji Naik on 20 March, 1928
Equivalent citations: (1928)30BOMLR1018
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1414 (2.16 seconds)Mulla Vittil Seeti Kutti And Ors. vs K.M.K. Kunhi Pathumma And Ors. on 23 April, 1917
also the judgment of Neville, J., In re Metropolis and Counties Permanent Investment Building Society: Catfield's case ... Metropolis and Counties Permanent Investment Building Society (1911) L.R. 1 Ch. 698, Neville, J., held that time for redemption of a common mortgage
T.A. Meenakshi Sundarammal And Anr. vs K. Subramania Ayyar And Ors. on 27 November, 1953
known judgment of Vaughan Williams J. in 'Jones v. Merionethshire Permanent Benefit Building Society', 1891-2 Ch 587 (F). The learned Judge ... seek his own advantage." (24) In -- 'Jones v. Merionethshire Permanent Benefit - Building Society', 1892-1 Ch 173 (G), Lindley L. J. pointed
Biswanath Panda vs Gadadhar Panda And Anr. on 19 August, 1969
delivery of possession of the suit-land. Thereafter Chintamani constructed a permanent building with latrine and well with his own money and acquired the status
Amanchi Venkatrama Sastrulu vs Nama Venkanna (Dead) And Anr. on 31 July, 1919
damages enunciated by the learned Judge was accepted in Royal Bristol Permanent Building Society v. Bomacha (1887) 35 Ch. D. 390. There are cases which
Magathane Kinara Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd vs Amogh Enterprises on 11 March, 2021
execute a agreement of re-development in relation to
the societies building. Permanent and temporary injunctions are
also sought restraining grant of development rights
Natarajan vs A.Marimuthu (Deceased) on 5 August, 2010
Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff (since deceased) attempted to raise a permanent building in the common property, to which the Respondent/Plaintiff (deceased) objected and also issued
Amogh Enterprises vs Magathane Kinara Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd on 11 March, 2021
execute a agreement of re-development in relation to
the societies building. Permanent and temporary injunctions are
also sought restraining grant of development rights
R.Kumar vs G.Jaganmoorthy
possession to the plaintiff and permanent injunction restraining the respondent/ defendant from in any manner by constructing permanent building in the B schedule property
Oscar Tex Rep By Its Partner Subramani vs Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board on 28 February, 2022
Kamarajar. Salai,.Athani Village.. They have not constructed any
permanent building, but only constructed a tin sheet enclosures and when they
approached the 2™ respondent