Tata Technologies Ltd.,, Pune vs Assessee on 27 February, 2015
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE
respondents. Further, according to them, the applicant is not a permanent employee of the respondents and he neither enjoys any post under the Government. Thus ... Constitution of India. However, this is not a case of a permanent employee whose services are being terminated but a temporary employee whose contract
from an employee and they are the best people to judge whether an employee should be continued in service and made a permanent employee ... fundamental difference between a probationer or a temporary employee and a permanent employee would be completely obliterated, which would be wholly wrong
employer and also involves consent of the employee. Generally the deputation is the assignment of an employee of one Department / cadre to another Department / cadre ... question that arose for consideration was whether respondent Agya Ram, a permanent employee of the Punjab Government, who held a temporary appointment as Settlement Officer
Shri G. Siva Rama Raju vs Union Of India Through on 18 September, 2015
CENTRAL
Hargurpartap versus State of Punjab that a contractual employee cannot be replaced by another contractual employee unless his performance or work is not satisfactory ... agreement dated 06.03.2014. The applicant is not a permanent employee of ECHS and the mere status of ECHS being a body constituted under Govt
ORAL)
1. The complainant/respondent No.1, Ganesh
Rao was a permanent employee of respondent No.2, Super Sincotex
India Ltd.. The contribution towards provident
P K Srivastava vs National Highways Authority Of India on 18 September, 2015
1 OA
B Ravi Shankar vs National Highways Authority Of India on 18 September, 2015
1 OA
Sanjay Channa vs National Highways Authority Of India on 18 September, 2015
1 OA No