2015 was given police
protection for the implementation of an injunction order in
her favour.
3. The facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of
these ... petitioners in O.P.(C)No.
982/2015 for permanent prohibitory injunction. Along with
the suit, they moved an interlocutory application
pending before the Munsiff Court, Thalassery which is a suit for
permanent prohibitory injunction. According to the plaintiff,
plaint A schedule property belongs
respondents are defendants.
The suit is one for permanent prohibitory injunction and other
reliefs. The commissioner was deputed in the suit for
submitting a report
instituted O.S.No.
499/2014 which was a suit for permanent prohibitory
injunction against the defendants from drawing pipe line and
committing other mischiefs
India.
2. O.S. 77 of 2011 was a suit for permanent
prohibitory injunction and for mandatory injunction. In the
suit a commission was taken
2014 OF MUNSIFF COURT,
PATHANAMTHITTA.
EXT. P2 : COPY OF INJUNCTION ORDER DTD.28.01.14 IN
I.A.179/14.
EXT. P3 : COPY OF COUNTER ... 2014. The suit was filed by the respondent for
permanent prohibitory injunction. Along with the suit, the
respondent-plaintiff filed I.A.No.179/2014
suit.
2. The suit is one for declaration and permanent
prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claimed that he obtained
property from one of the sharers
petitioner. He instituted O.S.No.
103/2013 for permanent prohibitory injunction. Along with
the suit, he moved
before the said court.
2. The plaintiff instituted a suit for permanent prohibitory
injunction restraining the defendants from destroying the well
situated in plaint
Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam. The suit was one for
permanent prohibitory injunction. After trial, suit was dismissed.
2. According to the petitioners, they have
