workmen as per the approved schedule as regular and
permanent and absorb them as permanent workmen from the date of
respective vacant post and grant ... Judgment after
completion 5 years workmen is entitled permanency and denial of
permanency though working on permanent setup IS clear case of unfair
labour practise
temporary or casual nature or work of a permanent nature; but a permanent workman is one who is engaged on a permanent nature of work ... construction of the definition of a permanent workman therefore is: A workman engaged on a work of permanent nature which lasts throughout the year
herein/workmen, joined the
petitioner/Company some time in the year 1966 as workmen and since
then, they became permanent employees/workmen of the
petitioner ... were not permanent workmen.
They were only temporary workmen. The 12[3]
Settlement dated 26.12.1992, clearly states that
only the permanent workmen will be entitled
wrong to suggest that management wanted to dismiss the services of
permanent workmen for their union activities and to replace them with
cheap contract workers ... were made by
management against the workmen to dismiss the permanent workmen en
masse and replace them with contract workmen; that it is wrong
permanent workman, discrepancy in the
payment of wage between permanent and non
permanent workman has to be considered as an unfair
labour practice. In support ... made
a claim for permanency before it. Their claim for
permanency had been rejected by the Award dated
20.02.1985. These workmen were only seeking
quantification
allegedly on contract. The
Industrial Court directed grant of permanency, to the said
employees/workmen, with all consequential benefits in the form of
status, wages ... Court
to grant certain reliefs to the workmen, which includes the
relief of giving the status of permanency to the contract
employees, such statutory power
learned Labour Court. He opposed the claim
that the claimant was permanent workman. Mr.
Munshaw, learned advocate for the corporation
submitted that ... favour of several
employees and resolved to grant status of
permanent workmen and benefit of regular pay
scale to all the employees whose names were
respondent/workman along with the reinstatement.
Learned counsel for the respondent/workman also submitted that the
appointment of the respondent/workman was shown ... workmen had been continued for years as badlis, casuals or
temporary workmen, with the object of depriving them of the
status and privileges of permanent
made permanent, and paid the same wages, allowances and benefits as the
permanent employees of the petitioner. The workmen contended that they were
doing work ... compared to those in permanent employment of
the petitioner. None of the benefits or other facilities enjoyed by the permanent
workmen were being offered
raised
industrial dispute seeking regularization of
their service and status of permanent workman. He
also claimed that the said industrial dispute was
referred for adjudication ... other workman
demanded regularization in service and status of
permanent workman) the panchayat terminated his
service under oral instruction on 24.6.2009. The
complainant claimed that
