irregular or illegal appointment or
that he was not a permanent workman and that he
was a daily wager and was not regular and
permanent ... workman or that
such direction should be deemed to be part of
direction to reinstate the workman even in case
where the concerned workman
concerned workmen concerned workmen
as contract labours especially when for last so many years they are
working directly as departmental workmen and the entire action ... workmen are not the permanent employees of the Petitioner the
question of extending the benefits granted to the permanent
workmen to them, does not arise
claim justifying
demand for regularization and permanency. So far as the
demand seeking regularization and status of permanent
workmen for the concerned persons is concerned ... concerned workmen and / or month of service completed
by the concerned workmen and / or fact that the
concerned workmen have worked continuously with the
petitioner
when the respondentworkman demanded
salary on the basis of pay scale, as if the respondentworkman is a permanent
workman, such prayer was never ... reference. Ultimately, the
workman was reinstated on 17th November, 1999.
(v) Now, the respondentworkman treated himself as a permanent
workman. This is an erroneous
workman as permanent
w.e.f. 01.04.2001 and to give him all the
benefits of permanency, however, no benefit of
permanency was granted prior ... workman as permanent
w.e.f. 01.04.2001 and to give him all the
benefits of permanency, however, no benefit of
permanency was granted prior
case may be, for making a badli
or temporary workman permanent."
Clause 32 of the MSO reads as under :-
"Nothing contained in these ... made permanent. It is, therefore, apparent that after
completion of such service, Respondent No. 1 has no
option but to make him permanent workman. Even
case may be, for making a badli
or temporary workman permanent."
Clause 32 of the MSO reads as under :-
"Nothing contained in these ... made permanent. It is, therefore, apparent that after
completion of such service, Respondent No. 1 has no
option but to make him permanent workman. Even
case may be, for making a badli
or temporary workman permanent."
Clause 32 of the MSO reads as under :-
"Nothing contained in these ... made permanent. It is, therefore, apparent that after
completion of such service, Respondent No. 1 has no
option but to make him permanent workman. Even
case may be, for making a badli
or temporary workman permanent."
Clause 32 of the MSO reads as under :-
"Nothing contained in these ... made permanent. It is, therefore, apparent that after
completion of such service, Respondent No. 1 has no
option but to make him permanent workman. Even
case may be, for making a badli
or temporary workman permanent."
Clause 32 of the MSO reads as under :-
"Nothing contained in these ... made permanent. It is, therefore, apparent that after
completion of such service, Respondent No. 1 has no
option but to make him permanent workman. Even
