well
settled that an authority can be styled to be a persona designata
if powers are conferred on a named person or authority and such ... have referred earlier contraindicates such
appellate authority to be a persona designata. It is clear that the
appellate authority constituted under Section
Judge,
Tahllassery has taken the view that since he is a persona designata he
cannot resort to Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning ... exercising powers under
Section 18 of the Rent Act is a persona designata. In our view the
said fair stand taken by learned Counsel
action is taken and the Court appoint the arbitrator when
the persona designata has failed to act, are taken note of in para ... time, it
also casts an onerous and responsible duty upon the persona designata
to appoint such persons/officers as the arbitrators who are not only
under Section 18 and
functioning as a Court but not as Persona
Designata under the Kerala Buildings (Lease
and Rent Control) Act, 1965 and
applicability ... Chief
Controlling Revenue Authority both are not
the Court but are Persona Designata and
therefore, such Persona Designata have no
jurisdiction and power to condone
case that the Rent Control Court is not a
persona designata as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Gopalan v. Aboobacker ... distinction
between a persona designata and a court has been set out in
the said decision . It is pointed out that the said decision
Occupants) Act, 1971 , it is the District Judge
who is a persona designata to hear the appeal and as the
appeal has been heard ... authority by office is as against a
designating individually. A persona designata is a person
who is appointed out or described as an individual
envisage that the power is conferred on the Chief
Justice as persona designata. Therefore, the fact that the power
is conferred on the Chief Justice
appearing in the
Indian Succession Act, 1925 is not persona designata, but
rather a District Judge 'as defined under Section
notified. It is clear that "Controller" is "persona designata" and not a Court. Similarly, a perusal of Section
purpose of this
case. The nominee was to act as a persona designata and his powers
in that capacity cannot be exercised by the successor
