appellant
had filed a petition under Section 317 of the Criminal Procedure Code
( Cr.P.C .) in Crl.M.P ... scope of
a petition either under Section 317 Cr.P.C. or under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C.,
with a fond hope that
distinction
between Section 317 of Cr.P.C. and Section 205 of Cr.P.C. Under
Section 317 of Cr.P.C., the absence ... examination, so also examination under Section 313 of Cr.P.C.,
whereas under Section 317 of Cr.P.C. no such permission can be
granted
part of the accused persons by
filing 317 Cr.P.C petitions.
17. Section 317 Cr.P.C stipulates provisions for enquiry and trial being ... Section 317 Cr.P.C, it cannot be a mechanical
affair.
19. In the present case, the number of Section 317 Cr.P.C petitions
absent and therefore, a Petition under Section 317 Cr.P.C., was filed and allowed for cross examination of P.W.1, finally the matter ... under Section 256 of Cr.P.C., was filed and allowed on his behalf. On behalf of the Accused under Section 317 Cr.P.C
Yashodhara Shroff vs Union Of India on 12 June, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2019 KAR
marked as Ex.P-5. As per the complaint of the Advocate Kabilan, P.W.1, which was marked as Ex.P-5, his statement ... therefore he asked me to file a petition Under Section 317 Cr.P.C.". However, in his deposition before the Enquiry Officer
produced before him and exercise his discretion vested under Sections 202 and
203 of Cr.P.C. The above guidelines are not exhaustive ... under Section 317 Cr.P.C, whenever petitioner could not appear in person,
excepting for purpose of questioning that may arise. So, Crl.O.P
case in Cr. No.88 of
2002 under Sections 419 and 363 IPC and arrested the accused.
3.2 In this petition, we are concerned with ... appear before the Trial
Court nor was a petition under Sec. 317 , Cr.P.C. (hereinafter referred to as
?the Code?) filed for condoning
produced before him and exercise his discretion vested under Sections 202 and 203 of Cr.P.C. The above guidelines are not exhaustive ... under Section 317 Cr.P.C, whenever petitioner could not appear in person, excepting for purpose of questioning that may arise. So, Crl.O.P
Accused Birbal Chaudhary had clearly been identified by P.W. 17.
On 27.11.2007, P.W. 17 clearly stated that while the other accused
were presentin ... that he had positive Nepali features.
In his several petitions under Section 317 Cr.P.C. he clearly represented
himself as Birbal Chaudhary @ Mukhiya
