discharged accused no.2
Rajkumar Pandiyan, on 27th December 2006, intercepted
the cell phone of Tulsiram Prajapati by alleging that said
Tushiram Prajapati has escaped ... respondent/discharged accused no.2
Rajkumar Pandiyan requested to intercept the mobile phone of
Tulsiram Prajapati.
13 Shri Tiwari, the learned counsel appearing
Counsel for the Appellant submitted that as far as the intercepted
phone call with Co-Convict No.1 is concerned, the same took place ... Abdul
Rehman through the phone of PW51 Tajir Pasha shows
the connection between them. Despite that the contents of
their intercepted conversation is inadmissible piece
sought permission from
authorities concerned for intercepting petitioner's phone conversations;
that on 17.03.2023 NIA had filed a final report in trial court against ... plain chronology itself,
i.e., NIA seeking permission to intercept petitioner's phone calls on
07.03.2023 immediately after the FB post
granted an approval as well as extensions to
monitor and intercept the mobile phone of the petitioner for a
period exceeding the statutory limit. Counsel ... accordance with law.
Counsel also submitted that the permission to
intercept the mobile phone of the petitioner is in blatant
violation of the relevant provisions
granted an approval as well as extensions to
monitor and intercept the mobile phone of the petitioner for a
period exceeding the statutory limit. Counsel ... accordance with law.
Counsel also submitted that the permission to
intercept the mobile phone of the petitioner is in blatant
violation of the relevant provisions
Indian Telegraphs Act, 1998 directing interception of telephonic
messages to and from Petitioner's mobile phones numbers and
disclosure thereof to Director ... March 2018, first
Respondent passed order authorising interception of any message from
and to the mobile phone bearing No. 8218574304 relating to clandestine
contact/movement
1000/- denominations, the mobile phone numbers of accused No.1
and others were lawfully intercepted under Section 5 of the Indian
Telegraph Act, 1885 after ... Government of India and the conversations that took
place on the intercepted phones were recorded. From the said
intercepted conversations on mobile phones
documents through which request was
made to MHA to intercept the phone calls of the accused. It
is also not denied by CBI that ... orders were the communications sent by CBI containing
request for interception of the phone calls and SMS of
accused. It is not justified
Sanjukta Samanta & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 26 September, 2025
1
Sanjukta Samanta & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 26 September, 2025
1
