Montfort School
then the call detail records/cell ID Chart of his phone should have
shown his location to be at Ashok Vihar ... witnesses admitted during cross-examination
that the investigating agency had been intercepting phone calls and
conducting surveillance of accused persons much prior
video footages as well as the transcription of public speeches and intercepted phone calls in
order to project that all the accused persons had conspired
care of it. Thereafter, the fourth accused informed the
third accused over phone that he had closed the matter for a disclosure ... public domain. Therefore, the first
respondent passed the order to intercept phone messages of the petitioners
herein.
12. In pursuant to the report submitted
with this phone
number. Phone no.9867994135 was allegedly used by the accused
no.2 and the phone no.9906869790 was allegedly used ... intercepted from 03/01/2006. The
interception was discontinued after 16/01/2016. After the
conversations were intercepted, they were recorded
with this phone
number. Phone no.9867994135 was allegedly used by the accused
no.2 and the phone no.9906869790 was allegedly used ... intercepted from 03/01/2006. The
interception was discontinued after 16/01/2016. After the
conversations were intercepted, they were recorded
with this phone
number. Phone no.9867994135 was allegedly used by the accused
no.2 and the phone no.9906869790 was allegedly used ... intercepted from 03/01/2006. The
interception was discontinued after 16/01/2016. After the
conversations were intercepted, they were recorded
with this phone
number. Phone no.9867994135 was allegedly used by the accused
no.2 and the phone no.9906869790 was allegedly used ... intercepted from 03/01/2006. The
interception was discontinued after 16/01/2016. After the
conversations were intercepted, they were recorded
Pranjal
Sharma was always under surveillance of the CBI and his phone was
intercepted.
3.5. The presence of Nirmalendu Saha was established in the guest ... petitioner Nirmalendu Saha was acquainted to
Pranjal Sharma. The conversations over phone, intercepted by the investigating
agency are nothing but conversations between two family friends
Section 5(2) of the Telegraph Act
with regard to interception of the phone of the petitioner in a sealed cover.
11. I have heard ... provisions of the Telegraph Act and obtained the
necessary authorization to intercept the phone of the petitioner. Therefore,
the judgments in PUCL (supra) and Jitender
Pranjal
Sharma was always under surveillance of the CBI and his phone was
intercepted.
3.5. The presence of Nirmalendu Saha was established in the guest ... petitioner Nirmalendu Saha was acquainted to
Pranjal Sharma. The conversations over phone, intercepted by the investigating
agency are nothing but conversations between two family friends
