Aggarwal & Ors. 16 of 175
5 Further investigations and mobile phone intercepts revealed
that accused Sunil Bhatia and Kiran Dhole were in touch with ... contract killing, extortion
and violence.
24 It was argued that various phone calls intercepts and
forensic evidence prima facie shows that it was Jupiter
Delhi for obtaining expert opinion from
forensic laboratory for intercepted calls of mobile phone no.
9811004309. Copies of relevant documents and transcriptions of
intercepted calls ... Analysis of transcriptions of mobile phone
no. 9811004309 revealed that this number remained on interception
from September 0210.2008 and was disconnected as regular order
Satender Singh has proved the copy of interception
order pertaining to mobile number including phone number
9876933745 as Ex. PW 19/A. He has also ... deposed that on 04.10.2008, he handed over
26 interception orders of phones to Insp. R. K. Singh (PW16) who
seized the same vide memo
2008 and the disclosures, records of seized mobile phones and
intercepted calls on electronic surveillance in the said case had revealed
that this accused ... falsely implicated him in this
case. As regards the intercepted mobile phone conversations, this
accused has taken a stand that the conversations
where
carrier Shekhawat was to meet dealer Vinod. From the interception of the mobile
phone of Taimur Khan who was proclaimed offender ... from Home Department, GNCT
of Delhi. He proved the interception orders pertaining to some mobile phones for the
period
intercepted calls were copied in CDs (that have
been exhibited and heard during trial) was not seized during investigation
and secondly that the intercepted phones ... case FIR No. 33/08, he had been monitoring
the interception of the mobile phones in question and that on 01.09.2008
on the request
intercepted calls were copied in CDs (that have
been exhibited and heard during trial) was not seized during investigation
and secondly that the intercepted phones ... Special Cell/NR, he had
intercepted and had heard the calls made using the mobile phones in
question. He has further deposed that the computer
responsibility did not arise. Again talks between these
two phones as referred to above were intercepted on 4.11.05 by
Intelligence Agencies. In that conversation, accused ... Intelligence Agencies
have given information to intercept phone no 9906719815 but cell
phone No 9906819815 was intercepted which is not the phone of
Tariq Ahmed
Letter of Commissioner
to Nodal Officers for
interception of phone
numbers
24. Ex. PW7/A to C CAF, CDR and
certificate ... mobile
phones which were also kept on surveillance and for interception.
Accordingly, the interception were recorded and on the basis of secret
information, accused Vikas
mobile phone
Nos.977581037 and 8348419636. Both the mobile phones
attributable to accused Mohd. Kaiyum and on the basis of
intercepted calls, conversation taken place ... phone of accused Mohd. Kaiyum No. 8348419636 on
the mobile phone of accused Mohd. Habibuddin No.
8527206176. Similarly, there is communication on the mobile
phone
