Date Of Decision:-16.5.2 vs State Of Haryana And Others on 16 May, 2011
Doordarshan and All India Radio, Delhi and Rohtak. The mobile
phone interception of suspect Head Constable Ranbir Singh was put on
survelliance for over
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 473 (2.04 seconds)Raj Kumar vs State Of Punjab on 4 March, 2024
placing reliance upon the same, she has contended that the phone of
Raj Kumar was sent to the FSL along with one pen-drive ... PHHC:030792
circumstances and by what authority was the phone intercepted and whether
such interception has been done under a procedure known to law.
Adjourned
Piyush Arora vs State Of Punjab on 4 March, 2024
placing reliance upon the same, she has contended that the phone of
Raj Kumar was sent to the FSL along with one pen-drive ... PHHC:030792
circumstances and by what authority was the phone intercepted and whether
such interception has been done under a procedure known to law.
Adjourned
Sunil vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 3 December, 2015
entire case has come up on the basis of illegal interception of the phones
ASHISH
2015.12.03 11:32
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity ... this
case are; (i) link of the two persons whose phones were
intercepted with FIR No.839 supra, (ii) whether the
interception was authorized
Dinesh Kumar @ Bobby vs State Of Haryana on 5 December, 2018
allegations against the petitioner
are that police while intercepting the phone of one Suresh Kumar bearing
number 9991344185 came to know about some corrupt practices
Sukhpal Singh Khaira vs State Of Punjab on 4 January, 2024
Sukhpal Singh Khaira vs State Of Punjab on 4 January, 2024
Author: Anoop Chitkara
Bench
Sukhpal Singh Khaira vs State Of Punjab And Others on 4 January, 2024
main argument of counsel for the pe oner is that the phone calls made
between Gurdev Singh, the pe oner, etc., are done ... that even
if these call records are not intercepted for tapping, mere records of receiving phone
calls do not disclose the conversa
Sameer Saggar vs State Of Haryana And Others on 30 August, 2011
That on 26.2.2010 Inspector Kulbhushan collected the Call
detail reports of mobile phones of Sameer Sagar and his
Crl. Misc. No.26838 ... submitted to cyber
cell Panchkula to put the suspected mobile phone numbers
on interception.
20.That on 11.3.2010 Inspector Kulbhushan collected the call
detail reports
Mohan Lal Kaushik vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 21 May, 2019
main ground taken is that though the alleged
interception of the phone calls was found in February 2014
and the matter was reported
Gian Singh vs State Of Haryana on 14 March, 2018
registered upon
conversations on two mobile phones i.e. 9888383520 and
9872042125 having been intercepted. The aforenoticed mobile
numbers as per prosecution belonging to Rakesh