Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 677 (3.18 seconds)

Notices. Decision In Om Prakash vs . State Iii (2014) Ccr on 4 April, 2018

also   case   of   the   prosecution   that   on 17.03.2013   on   interception   of   phone   calls   of   Mukesh,   it transpired   that   he   was   returning   to   Delhi   from   Faridpur ... certificate Ex PW1/A, interception order and   related   documents   for   the   year   2012   and   2013 regarding interception of phones,   pertaining to this case, were
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs 1) Manoj Saxena on 20 August, 2015

held in the above mentioned case law. Thus the moment intercepted phone conversations were downloaded on to audio cassettes / CDs, such a certificate should have ... also of no consequence as the electronic record relating to the intercepted phone conversations is inadmissible in evidence. 25. As recorded above, the trial
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1) Tariq Ahmad Dar on 16 February, 2017

satellite phone with number 008821621523999 being used by Abu-al-Kama a member of LeT. The said satellite phone was under lawful interception with Intelligence ... identification of the voice on the intercepted conversations. As per the report of CFSL, the intercepted voice was that of Tariq Ahmad Dar where
Delhi District Court Cites 64 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Arun Kumar Ors on 3 December, 2025

numbers which was kept under legal interception); one Dual SIM black colour phone with SIM Card of mobile nos. 9818319448 Digitally signed by ATUL AHLAWAT ... Road, Uttam Nagar, after a call on his mobile phone was made from the mobile phone of co-accused Anil Pratap Singh. Accused Alloy Frank
Delhi District Court Cites 69 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cbi vs Kehar Singh on 13 August, 2025

deposed that in 2016, one request was received from CBI for interception of phones in the present case. He further deposed that ... used to pass order for approval or disapproval for interception of the phones. He identified the signatures of Rajiv Mehrishi, Secretary and M.A Ganpathy
Delhi District Court Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

In Re vs . on 25 July, 2015

Aggarwal & Ors. 16 of 175 5 Further investigations and mobile phone intercepts revealed that accused Sunil Bhatia and Kiran Dhole were in touch with ... contract killing, extortion and violence. 24 It was argued that various phone calls intercepts and forensic evidence prima facie shows that it was Jupiter
Delhi District Court Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next