Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 167 (0.92 seconds)

State vs 1) Manoj Saxena on 20 August, 2015

held in the above mentioned case law. Thus the moment intercepted phone conversations were downloaded on to audio cassettes / CDs, such a certificate should have ... also of no consequence as the electronic record relating to the intercepted phone conversations is inadmissible in evidence. 25. As recorded above, the trial
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

In Re vs . on 25 July, 2015

Aggarwal & Ors. 16 of 175 5 Further investigations and mobile phone intercepts revealed that accused Sunil Bhatia and Kiran Dhole were in touch with ... contract killing, extortion and violence. 24 It was argued that various phone calls intercepts and forensic evidence prima facie shows that it was Jupiter
Delhi District Court Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs 1) Mohd. Kamil on 29 July, 2015

Kamil and Anwar had not revealed any phone details of Razia and he came to know the phone number of Razia from Maqsood. He stated ... CFSL, CBI. He did not remember the date from which the interception of phone calls of Razia and Maqsood had been initiated. He had prepared
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next