Counsel for the Appellant submitted that as far as the intercepted
phone call with Co-Convict No.1 is concerned, the same took place ... Abdul
Rehman through the phone of PW51 Tajir Pasha shows
the connection between them. Despite that the contents of
their intercepted conversation is inadmissible piece
Indian Telegraphs Act, 1998 directing interception of telephonic
messages to and from Petitioner's mobile phones numbers and
disclosure thereof to Director ... March 2018, first
Respondent passed order authorising interception of any message from
and to the mobile phone bearing No. 8218574304 relating to clandestine
contact/movement
documents through which request was
made to MHA to intercept the phone calls of the accused. It
is also not denied by CBI that ... orders were the communications sent by CBI containing
request for interception of the phone calls and SMS of
accused. It is not justified
that the intercepted material (during the first 7 days) are to be mandatorily
destroyed by intercepting agency if permission to intercept the Telegraph as
granted ... with the provision of Telegraph Act and obtained necessary authorization to
intercept the phone of the respondents and therefore, the judgment of PUCL
(supra
voice sample of the accused did not match
with the intercepted phone calls.
15. There is no dispute that detention order can be passed even
find force in the argument on behalf of the appellant that intercepted
phone call made by Binod Singh to another lady cannot be accepted ... relied upon by prosecution against him, is
Circumstance No.VI which is interception of Mobile No.9431990030 between
appellant- Jitendra Kumar Singh and one Jaleshwar
find force in the argument on behalf of the appellant that intercepted
phone call made by Binod Singh to another lady cannot be accepted ... relied upon by prosecution against him, is
Circumstance No.VI which is interception of Mobile No.9431990030 between
appellant- Jitendra Kumar Singh and one Jaleshwar
find force in the argument on behalf of the appellant that intercepted
phone call made by Binod Singh to another lady cannot be accepted ... relied upon by prosecution against him, is
Circumstance No.VI which is interception of Mobile No.9431990030 between
appellant- Jitendra Kumar Singh and one Jaleshwar
accused persons seeking inspection of original hard
drives containing intercepted phone conversation with certain conditions as
mentioned in the order.
4. Mr. Anupam S. Sharrma
placing reliance upon the same, she has contended that the phone of
Raj Kumar was sent to the FSL along with one pen-drive ... PHHC:030792
circumstances and by what authority was the phone intercepted and whether
such interception has been done under a procedure known to law.
Adjourned
