Digitally Signed
By:DAMINI YADAV
Signing Date:17.01.2022
18:23:07
mobile phones under telephonic surveillance during the period
when MCI received the application ... also argued that
the Compact Disc on which the alleged intercepted phone calls
were recorded was neither sent to CFSL nor was it used
replied to the RTI
application filed by Appellant. Further, lawful interception is done by Law
Enforcement Agencies duly authorised by Central and State Governments ... defeat the very purpose of lawful interception. Mr. Kumar contended that
disclosure of information related to lawful interception/phone tapping is
exempted under section
Satender Singh has proved the copy of interception
order pertaining to mobile number including phone number
9876933745 as Ex. PW 19/A. He has also ... deposed that on 04.10.2008, he handed over
26 interception orders of phones to Insp. R. K. Singh (PW16) who
seized the same vide memo
where
carrier Shekhawat was to meet dealer Vinod. From the interception of the mobile
phone of Taimur Khan who was proclaimed offender ... from Home Department, GNCT
of Delhi. He proved the interception orders pertaining to some mobile phones for the
period
both of them refused.
Conversations on the Pakistan mobile phone number have
been intercepted and recorded. Upon arrest of Mohd. Rashid, the
IO was granted ... mobile phone/ phone numbers as mentioned in
the order passed under his signature and the said phone numbers
were already under interception
required under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 . The phone calls of
employees of NSE were illegally intercepted without their consent or
knowledge. The comparison ... under para 8.1 it is stated that M/s ISEC illegally
intercepted the phone calls of employees of NSE by installing illegal
machines which
were
under lawful interception and all calls made on these phones
were being intercepted. It is stated that applications for taking
voice samples of accused ... accused persons,
for obtaining the CDRs of the recovered mobile phones and the
mobile phones of the other persons with whom they were in
regular
basis of source information
against A1 by interception of the phone calls. They further submitted
that there is no phone call conversation between the petitioners ... after
obtaining necessary permission from the Ministry of Home Affairs,
intercepted the mobile phones of A1, recorded voice of A1 and A2, which
was identified
2019 vide FIR Nos.
6/2019 & 7/2019 foralleged illegal interception of telephone calls. The
respondents attempted to arrest the applicant after registering ... deputed a team of
officers from Chhattisgarh to New Delhi and intercepted the phones of
the family members to trace the applicant for serving notices
Rule 4 of the Information
Technology(Procedure and Safeguards for Interception, Monitoring and Decryption
of Information) Rules 2009. The petitions are still pending before ... Indian
Telegraph Rules, 1951 are specifically adhered to which allows lawful interception
of phones under unavoidable circumstances, upon obtaining necessary approval
from the competent authority
