tap phones is
traceable to Section 5(2) of the Act. Unless the jurisdictional conditions
in that provision are satisfied, phone tapping would be illegal ... context of private
conversations over the telephone/mobile
phone? Does the unauthorized phone tapping
violate Article 21 of The Constitution?
(2) Does the impugned order
updated his i-phone as per
the instructions received through mail and he thought that his phone
was in tapping.
17. Meanwhile ... tapping of his phone. Registration of 2nd FIR with regard to very same
allegations of phone tapping is impermissible. The said issue is no
more
updated his i-phone as per
the instructions received through mail and he thought that his phone
was in tapping.
16. Meanwhile ... that his phone
Nos.9014062471 and also 0593766666 as well as his wife's phone
number i.e. 9100245853 were illegally tapped
Regarding Alleged Phone Tapping By Pakistan'S I.S.I. on 3 March, 2015
Sixteenth Loksabha
an>
Title: Regarding alleged phone tapping
press conference, the 13 th respondent admitted
the illegal phone tapping of various persons, including police
officials, politicians and others, done ... tap any telephonic
conversation of any person under any statute. Since the
petitioner procured evidence that the 13 th respondent had
tapped his phone
while he was serving in DVAC, Chennai, in connection with a Phone Tapping Case, during the pendency of trial of the case, approached this Court ... honest efforts in pursuing the proceedings connected to the phone tapping scandal which in a way had its impact on the reputation of the Directorate
Regarding Alleged Tapping Of Phones Of Chief Minister Of Uttar Pradesh And A ... on 28 April, 2005
LOK SABHA DEBATES
LOK SABHA
-------
Thursday, April ... Clock
(MR. SPEAKER in the Chair)
Title: Regarding alleged tapping of phones of Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh and a Member of Parliament.
MR. SPEAKER
Application dated 24/02/2011 had sought
certain information pertains to phone tapping i.e. number of phones tapped
between the years ... names of persons whose phones were
tapped, facts and reasons for phone tapping etc.
2. The CPIO vide his reply dated 29/03/2011
Supreme Court was of
phone tapping. In the present case, the
question of tapping phone of the
Teachers does not arise. They are only
being ... through Android Mobile Phone or they
have to file and Affidavit and, therefore,
it is not a case of phone tapping. The
judgment delivered
various agencies including names of the agencies, pertaining to
interception/phone tapping/monitoring or decryption under section 69 of the
Information Technology ... informed the Appellant that disclosure of information related to
lawful interception/phone tapping/monitor or decrypt is exempt from disclosure
under section
