appellant Madan Lal and he attributed it to the lapse of
memory. From the aforesaid version, it is apparent that the aforesaid
contradictions ... large a witness cannot be expected to possess a photographic
memory and to recall the details of an incident
expected from a normal human
being to have a photographic memory so as to narrate an incident in
the same manner by using the same
large a witness cannot be expected to
possess a photographic memory and to recall the
details of an incident
imprudent on the part
of court to insist for photographic memory. The attempt of
the court, according to learned Public Prosecutor, is to see
whether
large a witness cannot be expected to possess a
photographic memory and to recall the details of an incident
large a witness cannot be expected to possess a
photographic memory and to recall the details of an incident
almost six
years. The witness do not have a photographic memory, therefore, it
is but natural that there would be some discrepancies in the
evidence
state that a witness
cannot be expected to possess a photographic memory and
to recall the details of an incident
large a witness cannot be expected to
possess a photographic memory and to recall the
details of an incident
large a witness cannot be expected to
possess a photographic memory and to recall the
details of an incident
