taken against police officials
alone. It is for the said reason that the police officer heading the police force
is required to be given ... Police Complaints Authority.
xxx xxx xxx
The complaint to the Police Authority under the statue is only
with regard to complaint of misconduct
pressure of the police
officials, the acts of police malfeasance are also increasing.
The departmental mechanism for dealing with such police
misconduct should be strengthened ... police" comes in the state list of the Seventh
Schedule under Article 246 of the Constitution of India, the
police misconduct can give rise
Constitution of India and makes him
completely unfit for police service. The misconduct on
the part of Constable Samit Kumar, No. 1543 ... Constitution of India and makes him
completely unfit for Police Service. The misconduct on
the part the appellant was of such a grave nature that
Constitution of
India and makes him completely unfit for police service.
The misconduct on the part of HC (Exe.) Babu Lal, No.
2274 ... misconduct as every case is decided on its
own circumstances and merits. Moreover, this type of
misconduct has put the entire police force to shame
Raja Singh
(already dismissed police personnel of Punjab Police)
and HC Shree Pal (already dismissed police personnel
from Delhi Police Outer District). HC Jasveer Singh ... tarnished the image of Delhi Police and brought
disgrace to the organization but also demoralized other
police personnel. The misconduct committed by them
Delhi Police. The appellant had acted in a manner
highly unbecoming of a police official. After such
act of serious misconduct, if the appellant ... Delhi Police. The appellant had acted in a manner
highly unbecoming of a police official. After such
act of serious misconduct, if the appellant
Complaints Authority
would take cognizance of only allegations of serious
misconduct by the police personnel, which would include
incidents involving death, grievous hurt or rape ... perform the following
functions:-
(a) to enquire into allegations of serious misconduct,
against police personnel in subordinate rank, either suo
motto or on a complaint
course. The appellant is guilty of
gravest acts of misconduct proving complete unfitness for
police service and the punishment awarded to him is
commensurate with ... conclusion that he was guilty of grave acts of
misconduct proving complete unfitness for police service and the
punishment awarded to him is commensurate with
claiming that his conduct was neither gravest
misconduct nor continued misconduct proving incorrigibility and complete
unfitness for police service, thus, he could not be dismissed ... police officer is accused of gravest misconduct; or
ii. The cumulative effect of continued misconduct proves
that police officer is incorrigible and completely unfit
claiming that his conduct was neither
gravest misconduct nor continued misconduct proving incorrigibility and
complete unfitness for police service, thus, he could not be dismissed ... police officer is accused of gravest misconduct;
or
2. The cumulative effect of continued misconduct proves
that police officer is incorrigible and completely unfit
