Sanjay Kumar that the accused landlord did not get the
police verification conducted. An FIR bearing no. 279/2021 u/s
FIR No.: 279/2021 ... same was
pending at the end of the police and also the police verification of
tenant Madinah was done by the accused
Yadram Page No. 1 of 10
VISA and passport, without any police verification. It is the case of
the prosecution that the accused Yadram ... when others will be
caught in future by the police, he can use his police verification as
defence. He denied that he is deposing falsely
employed as servant in the above said saloon/shop,
without due police verification and thereby the order No. 560-
620/ACP/Paharganj, dated ... that on prior
occasion, Delhi Police had already informed the public through
camp and loudspeaker regarding the police verification of
tenants/servants. By doing
namely Ranjeet, employed as
servant in the said salon, without due police verification and
thereby the order No. 560-620/ACP/Paharganj, dated ... stated that
he was working in the salon and his police verification had not
been done by the owner of of the salon, namely, Pradeep
that his employer had not got
conducted his police verification or that he made his statement to this effect to
the police or that ... this case) was arrived and he was asked about the police
verification of PW1 Atabul Ansari and the accused failed to show any police
employed one servant namely Hari s/o Lal Bahadur without his police
verification and thereby accused violated the notification no. 8495-8594/SO-
ACP/Tilak ... Manendra were on patrolling duty
and during patrolling they were conducting police verification and they reached at
DDA Market H Block Vikas Puri at around
around 5-6 months back some
police officials came and asked him about his police verification. He deposited his
ID proof with Manager Naresh, however ... Surender were on patrolling duty and
during patrolling they were conducting police verification and they reached at shop
no. A-151 Rajmandir Vikas Puri
Satpal was found working in Nandni Pruthi Maker Studio without police verification and
thereby accused violated the notification no. 16076-175/ACP/Tilak Nagar dated ... person namely Sachin who was found to be working there
without police verification. They asked about his employee police verification to which he
stated that
Gali No 11, Prahlad ka Makan, Vipin Garden. and without police
verification. It is the case of the prosecution that the accused
Prahlad Malik ... carry out the police verification of the
abovesaid tenant who was residing in his house. An FIR bearing no.
418/2021
course. He also
said that he did not get the police verification conducted as the same was already
done by the agency ... same fact was also
averred by her during her police verification and also considering the
contradiction in the version
