lodged a first information report on 10-1-67 before Arwal Polioe which was registered as case No. 4/1/67. Whereas petitioner
petitioner further submits that the petitioner is 60%
handicapped, he is polio ridden and he cannot even walk freely.
The Civil Surgeon has issued certificate ... made against the petitioner and the fact that the
petitioner is a polio ridden and he is 60% disabled, the petitioner
above named
Chandigarh, he is having 66% physical disability due to post polio
residual paralysis and affected part of body happens to be right lower
limb
husband and infant child
was coming back after getting her child administered polio
drops and reached near the place of Dilip, when the accused
persons
alongwith her husband were returning
home after getting their child administered Polio Drop, the
accused persons including the petitioner herein intercepted and
Patna High Court
District Ferozepur. One
of his sons is 90% disabled and suffering from polio disease. Petitioner and
his elder son are working as Submersible Motor Repair
daughter-in-law of
the informant while she was going to administer polio drop to her
son and thrown him due to which he died
meeting held on 24.2.2006 at the Vidyapati Smarak Bhavan
regarding Pulse Polio Programme the accused petitioner addressed the
Anganwari Sevikas and threatened them
accused No. 6 and prosecution witness No. 4, the Sub-Inspector of Polios of Kowtalam, and there was a charge against 6th accused of having
extent
of 100% as his both legs are afflicted by polio. He uses
crutches for walking. Further, injury attributed to Sandeep,
co-accused